«Doctor as a drug» in a stroke follow-up
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-1-107-111
Аннотация
Highlights. We described a new concept of illness. Within its framework we have shown the role of a physician-patient relationship in the improvement of follow-up adherence in the post-stroke patient during COVID-19 pandemic.
Abstract. Each year about 400 000 people in Russia get strokes. Whereas an acute treatment takes place in specialized intensive care units in hospitals, follow-up is handed over to general (rarely - private) practitioner. The majority of stroke survivors show low adherence to follow-up resulting in repeated hospitalizations and growth of multi-morbidity burden. With COVID-19 pandemic negatively affecting availability of medical services and increasing health risks for stroke survivors, a physician-patient relation becomes the means of persuading patients to health-promoting behaviour.
При поддержке: The article is published within the framework of the main scientific topics of Novosibirsk State University and Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases»: No. 0419-2022-0002 Development of innovative models for managing the risk of circulatory diseases taking into account comorbidity based on the study of fundamental, clinical, epidemiological mechanisms and organizational technologies of medical care in the industrial region of Siberia.
Об авторах
E. A. Aleshchenko
Otto-von-Guericke Universitat Magdeburg; Novosibirsk State University
Россия
Конфликт интересов:
Россия
Ekaterina A. Aleshchenko - PhD in economics, MBA in International Healthcare Management, researcher at the Institute for Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke Universitat Magdeburg; lecturer at the Fundamental Medicine Chair of Novosibirsk State University.
2, Universitatsplatz, Magdeburg, Germany, 39106; 1, Pirogova, Novosibirsk, 630090.
Конфликт интересов:
E.A. Aleshchenko declares no conflict of interest
V. V. Kashtalap
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
Россия
Конфликт интересов:
Россия
Vasily V. Kashtalap - PhD, Associate Professor, Head of Clinical Cardiology Department, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases”.
6, Sosnoviy Blvd, Kemerovo, 650002.
Конфликт интересов:
V.V. Kashtalap is the member of the editorial board of the journal “Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases”
Список литературы
1. Пирадов М. А., Максимова М. Ю. , Танашян М. М.Инсульт : пошаговая инструкция. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2019. 272 с.
2. Wade D.T., Halligan P.W. Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems? BMJ. 2004;329(7479):1398-401. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7479.1398..
3. Kusnanto H., Agustian D., Hilmanto D. Biopsychosocial model of illnesses in primary care: A hermeneutic literature review. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018;7(3):497-500. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_145_17.
4. Applying A., Nair D., Cukor D., Taylor W.D., Cavanaugh K.L.Biopsychosocial Framework to Achieve Durable Behavior Change in Kidney Disease. Seminars in nephrology. 2021; 41 (6):487-504. doi:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2021.10.002
5. Balint M. The doctor, his patient and the illness. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. 416 p.
6. Wang Y., Wu Q., Wang Y., Wang P. The Effects of Physicians' Communication and Empathy Ability on PhysicianPatient Relationship from Physicians' and Patients' Perspectives. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022;28:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10880-022-09844-1.
7. Barrett T.M., Green J.A., Greer R.C., Ephraim P.L., Peskoe S., Pendergast J.F., Hauer C.L., Strigo T.S., Norfolk E., Bucaloiu I.D., Diamantidis C.J., Hill-Briggs F.F., Browne T., Jackson G.L., Boulware L.E.; PREPARE NOW study investigators. Advanced CKD Care and Decision Making: Which Health Care Professionals Do Patients Rely on for CKD Treatment and Advice? Kidney Med. 20205;2(5):532-542.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.05.008.
8. Schonenberg A., Teschner U., Prell T. Expectations and behaviour of older adults with neurological disorders regarding general practitioner consultations: an observational study. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21: 512. doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02469-3
9. Smith S.M., Soubhi H., Fortin M., Hudon C., O'Dowd T. Managing patients with multimorbidity: systematic review of interventions in primary care and community settings. BMJ (Online).2012;345(7874):e5205 doi 10.1136/bmj.e5205
10. Seng E.K., Prieto P., Boucher G., Vives-Mestres M. Anxiety, Incentives, and Adherence to Self-Monitoring on a Mobile Health Platform: A Naturalistic Longitudinal Cohort Study in People With Headache. Headache. 2018;58(10):1541-1555. doi: 10.1111/head.13422..
11. Dopelt K., Bachner Y.G., Urkin J., Yahav Z., Davidovitch N., Barach P. Perceptions of Practicing Physicians and Members of the Public on the Attributes of a "Good Doctor". Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 31;10(1):73. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010073.
12. Schnelle C., Jones M.A. Protocol for a Qualitative Study on Doctors' Opinions on and Experiences of Exceptionally Good Doctors. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022;13:103-109. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S343554..
13. Rost K., Frankel R. The introduction of the older patient's problems in the medical visit. J Aging Health. 1993 Aug;5(3):387-401. doi: 10.1177/089826439300500306 .
14. Ridd M., Shaw A., Lewis G., Salisbury C. The patientdoctor relationship: a synthesis of the qualitative literature on patients' perspectives. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(561):e116-33. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420248..
15. Zayac R.M., Van Stratton J.E., Ratkos T., Williams M., Geiger A., Paulk A. A Preliminary Assessment of the Qualities and Behaviors of Exemplary Practitioners: Perspectives From U.S.-Based Behavior Analysts. Behav Anal Pract. 2021;14(2):342-351. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00522-y. 1.
16. Steiner-Hofbauer V., Schrank B., Holzinger A. What is a good doctor? Wien Med Wochenschr. 2018;168(15-16):398-405. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0597-8.
17. Xiao X., Song H., Sang T., Wu Z., Xie Y., Yang Q. Analysis of Real-World Implementation of the Biopsychosocial Approach to Healthcare: Evidence From a Combination of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:725596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.725596..
18. Epstein RM. The science of patient-centered care. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(9):805-7.
19. Swenson S.L., Zettler P., Lo B. 'She gave it her best shot right away': patient experiences of biomedical and patientcentered communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(2):200-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.019..
20. Барбараш О.Л., Каретникова В.Н., Кашталап В.В., Зверева Т.Н., Кочергина А.М. Новая коронавирусная болезнь (COVID-19) и сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. Комплексные проблемы сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. 2020;9(2):17-28. https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2020-9-2-17-28
21. Asadi-Pooya A.A., Simani L. Central nervous system manifestations of COVID-19: A systematic review. J Neurol Sci. 2020;413:116832. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116832.
22. Mao L., Jin H., Wang M., Hu Y., Chen S., He Q., Chang J., Hong C., Zhou Y., Wang D., Miao X., Li Y., Hu B. Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(6):683-690. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1127.
23. Frobert O., Gotberg M., Erlinge D., Akhtar Z., Christiansen E.H., MacIntyre C.R., Oldroyd K.G., Motovska Z., Erglis A., Moer R. et al. Influenza Vaccination After Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial. Circulation. 2021;144(18):1476-1484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057042.
24. Street R.L. Jr., O'Malley K.J., Cooper L.A., Haidet P. Understanding concordance in patient-physician relationships: personal and ethnic dimensions of shared identity. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(3):198-205. doi: 10.1370/afm.821.
25. Nakao M., Komaki G., Yoshiuchi K., Deter H.C., Fukudo S. Biopsychosocial medicine research trends: connecting clinical medicine, psychology, and public health. Biopsychosoc Med. 2020;14(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13030-020-00204-9.
26. Chang D.S., Chen W.L., Wang R. Impact of the bidirectional relationship between communication and cognitive efficacy on orthopedic patient adherence behavior. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07575-5.
27. Roter D.L., Stewart M., Putnam S.M., Lipkin M. Jr., Stiles W., Inui T.S. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997;277(4):350-6.
28. Wallis C.J.D., Jerath A., Coburn N., Klaassen Z., Luckenbaugh A.N., Magee D.E., Hird A.E., Armstrong K., Ravi B., Esnaola N.F., Guzman J.C.A., Bass B., Detsky A.S., Satkunasivam R. Association of Surgeon-Patient Sex Concordance With Postoperative Outcomes. JAMA Surg. 2022;157(2):146-156. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6339
29. Ho A.F., Zhou Y., Kirby J.J., Rahman M.M., Tessitore K., Abdel-Raziq Y., d'Etienne J.P., Schrader C.D., Wang H. Causal Effect Analysis of Demographic Concordance of Physician Trust and Respect in an Emergency Care Setting. Open Access Emerg Med. 2021;13:503-509. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S334495
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Aleshchenko E.A., Kashtalap V.V. «Doctor as a drug» in a stroke follow-up. Комплексные проблемы сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. 2022;11(1):107-111. https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-1-107-111
For citation:
Aleshchenko E.A., Kashtalap V.V. “Doctor as a drug” in a stroke follow-up. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2022;11(1):107-111. https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-1-107-111
Просмотров:
456
