“Doctor as a drug” in a stroke follow-up
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-1-107-111
Abstract
Each year about 400 000 people in Russia get strokes. Whereas an acute treatment takes place in specialized intensive care units in hospitals, follow-up is handed over to general (rarely – private) practitioner. The majority of stroke survivors show low adherence to follow-up resulting in repeated hospitalizations and growth of multi-morbidity burden. With COVID-19 pandemic negatively affecting availability of medical services and increasing health risks for stroke survivors, a physician-patient relation becomes the means of persuading patients to healthpromoting behaviour.
Supporting agencies: The article is published within the framework of the main scientific topics of Novosibirsk State University and Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases»: No. 0419-2022-0002 Development of innovative models for managing the risk of circulatory diseases taking into account comorbidity based on the study of fundamental, clinical, epidemiological mechanisms and organizational technologies of medical care in the industrial region of Siberia.
About the Authors
E. A. Aleshchenko
Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg;
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Aleshchenko Ekaterina A., PhD in economics, MBA in International Healthcare Management, researcher at the Institute for Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty; lecturer at the Fundamental Medicine Chair
2, Universitätsplatz, Magdeburg, Germany, 39106;
1, Pirogova, Novosibirsk, 630090
Competing Interests:
E.A. Aleshchenko declares no conflict of interest. V.V. Kashtalap is the member of the editorial board of the journal “Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases”.
V. V. Kashtalap
Federal State Budgetary Institution “Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases”
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Kashtalap Vasily V., PhD, Associate Professor, Head of Clinical Cardiology Department
6, Sosnoviy Blvd, Kemerovo, 650002
Competing Interests:
E.A. Aleshchenko declares no conflict of interest. V.V. Kashtalap is the member of the editorial board of the journal “Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases”.
References
1. Piradov M.A., Maksimova M.J., Tanashjan M.M. Stroke. Step-by-step instructions. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2019. 272 p.
2. Wade D.T., Halligan P.W. Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems? BMJ. 2004;329(7479):1398-401. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7479.1398.
3. Kusnanto H., Agustian D., Hilmanto D. Biopsychosocial model of illnesses in primary care: A hermeneutic literature review. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018;7(3):497-500. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_145_17.
4. Applying A., Nair D., Cukor D., Taylor W.D., Cavanaugh K.L. Biopsychosocial Framework to Achieve Durable Behavior Change in Kidney Disease. Seminars in nephrology. 2021; 41 (6):487-504. doi:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2021.10.002
5. Balint M. The doctor, his patient and the illness. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. 416 p.
6. Wang Y., Wu Q., Wang Y., Wang P. The Effects of Physicians' Communication and Empathy Ability on PhysicianPatient Relationship from Physicians' and Patients' Perspectives. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022;28:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10880-022-09844-1.
7. Barrett T.M., Green J.A., Greer R.C., Ephraim P.L., Peskoe S., Pendergast J.F., Hauer C.L., Strigo T.S., Norfolk E., Bucaloiu I.D., Diamantidis C.J., Hill-Briggs F.F., Browne T., Jackson G.L., Boulware L.E.; PREPARE NOW study investigators. Advanced CKD Care and Decision Making: Which Health Care Professionals Do Patients Rely on for CKD Treatment and Advice? Kidney Med. 20205;2(5):532-542.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.05.008.
8. Schonenberg A., Teschner U., Prell T. Expectations and behaviour of older adults with neurological disorders regarding general practitioner consultations: an observational study. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21: 512. doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02469-3
9. Smith S.M., Soubhi H., Fortin M., Hudon C., O'Dowd T. Managing patients with multimorbidity: systematic review of interventions in primary care and community settings. BMJ (Online).2012;345(7874):e5205 doi 10.1136/bmj.e5205
10. Seng E.K., Prieto P., Boucher G., Vives-Mestres M. Anxiety, Incentives, and Adherence to Self-Monitoring on a Mobile Health Platform: A Naturalistic Longitudinal Cohort Study in People With Headache. Headache. 2018;58(10):1541-1555. doi: 10.1111/head.13422..
11. Dopelt K., Bachner Y.G., Urkin J., Yahav Z., Davidovitch N., Barach P. Perceptions of Practicing Physicians and Members of the Public on the Attributes of a "Good Doctor". Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 31;10(1):73. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010073.
12. Schnelle C., Jones M.A. Protocol for a Qualitative Study on Doctors' Opinions on and Experiences of Exceptionally Good Doctors. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022;13:103-109. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S343554..
13. Rost K., Frankel R. The introduction of the older patient's problems in the medical visit. J Aging Health. 1993 Aug;5(3):387-401. doi: 10.1177/089826439300500306 .
14. Ridd M., Shaw A., Lewis G., Salisbury C. The patientdoctor relationship: a synthesis of the qualitative literature on patients' perspectives. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(561):e116-33. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420248..
15. Zayac R.M., Van Stratton J.E., Ratkos T., Williams M., Geiger A., Paulk A. A Preliminary Assessment of the Qualities and Behaviors of Exemplary Practitioners: Perspectives From U.S.-Based Behavior Analysts. Behav Anal Pract. 2021;14(2):342-351. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00522-y. 1.
16. Steiner-Hofbauer V., Schrank B., Holzinger A. What is a good doctor? Wien Med Wochenschr. 2018;168(15-16):398-405. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0597-8.
17. Xiao X., Song H., Sang T., Wu Z., Xie Y., Yang Q. Analysis of Real-World Implementation of the Biopsychosocial Approach to Healthcare: Evidence From a Combination of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:725596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.725596..
18. Epstein RM. The science of patient-centered care. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(9):805-7.
19. Swenson S.L., Zettler P., Lo B. 'She gave it her best shot right away': patient experiences of biomedical and patientcentered communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(2):200-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.019..
20. Barbarash O.L., Karetnikova V.N., Kashtalap V.V., Zvereva T.N., Kochergina A.M. New coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and cardiovascular disease. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2020;9(2):17-28. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2020-9-2-17-28
21. Asadi-Pooya A.A., Simani L. Central nervous system manifestations of COVID-19: A systematic review. J Neurol Sci. 2020;413:116832. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116832.
22. Mao L., Jin H., Wang M., Hu Y., Chen S., He Q., Chang J., Hong C., Zhou Y., Wang D., Miao X., Li Y., Hu B. Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(6):683-690. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1127.
23. Frobert O., Gotberg M., Erlinge D., Akhtar Z., Christiansen E.H., MacIntyre C.R., Oldroyd K.G., Motovska Z., Erglis A., Moer R. et al. Influenza Vaccination After Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial. Circulation. 2021;144(18):1476-1484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057042..
24. Street R.L. Jr., O'Malley K.J., Cooper L.A., Haidet P. Understanding concordance in patient-physician relationships: personal and ethnic dimensions of shared identity. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(3):198-205. doi: 10.1370/afm.821.
25. Nakao M., Komaki G., Yoshiuchi K., Deter H.C., Fukudo S. Biopsychosocial medicine research trends: connecting clinical medicine, psychology, and public health. Biopsychosoc Med. 2020;14(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13030-020-00204-9.
26. Chang D.S., Chen W.L., Wang R. Impact of the bidirectional relationship between communication and cognitive efficacy on orthopedic patient adherence behavior. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07575-5.
27. Roter D.L., Stewart M., Putnam S.M., Lipkin M. Jr., Stiles W., Inui T.S. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997;277(4):350-6.
28. Wallis C.J.D., Jerath A., Coburn N., Klaassen Z., Luckenbaugh A.N., Magee D.E., Hird A.E., Armstrong K., Ravi B., Esnaola N.F., Guzman J.C.A., Bass B., Detsky A.S., Satkunasivam R. Association of Surgeon-Patient Sex Concordance With Postoperative Outcomes. JAMA Surg. 2022;157(2):146-156. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6339
29. Ho A.F., Zhou Y., Kirby J.J., Rahman M.M., Tessitore K., Abdel-Raziq Y., d'Etienne J.P., Schrader C.D., Wang H. Causal Effect Analysis of Demographic Concordance of Physician Trust and Respect in an Emergency Care Setting. Open Access Emerg Med. 2021;13:503-509. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S334495.
Review
For citations:
Aleshchenko E.A., Kashtalap V.V. “Doctor as a drug” in a stroke follow-up. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2022;11(1):107-111. https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-1-107-111
Views:
460
