Radial artery – perspective or fallacy?
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-4S-173-181
Abstract
Highlights. Radial artery is the second after internal thoracic artery by frequency of use among all of autogenous arterial conduits. Some modern studies indicate the superiority of this conduit to autogenous venous conduits; however, it remains an ongoing discussion.
The article presence an analytical review regarding the use of the radial artery as one of conduits during coronary artery bypass grafting. Historical and contemporary perspectives of its use are given, examples of large-scale studies and results are provided, including the “graft-artery junction” concept.
Abstract. Radial artery (RA) is the second after internal thoracic artery (ITA) by frequency of use among all of autogenous arterial conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), however it is used in less than 13% of cases. The story of RA as a conduit starts in the 1970s, when the famous French surgeon, founder of modern mitral valve repair Alain Frédéric Carpentier proposed to use it. During the development of cardiovascular surgery, RA was actively introduced as a conduit for CABG, and nowadays there are both supporters and opponents of its application. On the one hand, long-term results of CABG with RA are superior to CABG with autogenous venous conduits, whereas the patency of RA is comparable with ITA. On the other hand, RA demonstrates worse angiographic indicators, which could be explained by a diffuse narrowing resulting in complete occlusion; such phenomenon is entitled “string-sign”. Moreover, as in case with other conduits, the site of proximal anastomosis, and harvesting method (open or endoscopic) play an important role in the long-term RA functioning and its resistance to atherosclerosis in grafted coronary arteries, thus making RA a good target for studing and predetermining new perspectives of its use.
About the Author
A. V. FrolovRussian Federation
Alexey V. Frolov - MD, PhD, Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Interventional and Reconstructive Surgery of Heart and Vessels, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Surgeon at the Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases.
6, Sosnoviy Blvd., Kemerovo, 650002
Competing Interests:
The author declares no conflict of interest
References
1. Carpentier A., Guermonprez J. L., Deloche A., Frechette C., DuBost C. The Aorta-to-Coronary Radial Artery Bypass Graft. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1973;16(2), 111–121. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65825-0
2. Carpentier A. Discussion of Geha A.S., Krone R.J., McCormick J.R., Baue A.E. Selection of coronary bypass: anatomic, physiological, and angiographic considerations of vein and mammary artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975;70:414-31.
3. Curtis J.J., Stoney W.S.,Alford W.C.Jr., Burrus G.R., Thomas C.S. Jr. Intimal hyperplasia. A cause of radial artery aortocoronary bypass graft failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 1975;20:628-35
4. Buxton B.F., Galvin S.D. The history of arterial revascularization: from Kolesov to Tector and beyond. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2(4):419-26. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.07.24
5. Acar C., Jebara V. A., Portoghese M., Beyssen B., Pagny J. Y., Grare P., Carpentier A. F. Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1992;54(4), 652–660. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(92)91007-v
6. Amano A., Hirose H., Takahashi A., Nagano N. Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery: midterm results in a Japanese institute. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(1):120-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02706-0
7. Buxton B.F., Raman J.S., Ruengsakulrach P., Gordon I., Rosalion A., Bellomo R., Horrigan M., Hare D.L. Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five-year interim results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125(6):1363-71. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(02)73241-8
8. Attaran S., John L., El-Gamel A. Clinical and potential use of pharmacological agents to reduce radial artery spasm in coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(4):1483-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.10.042
9. He G.W. Arterial grafts: clinical classification and pharmacological management. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2(4):507-518. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.07.12
10. Gaudino M., Crea F., Cammertoni F., Mazza A., Toesca A., Massetti M. Morpho-functional features of the radial artery: implications for use as a coronary bypass conduit. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(5):1875-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.101
11. Martínez-González B., Reyes-Hernández C.G., Quiroga-Garza A., Rodríguez-Rodríguez V.E., Esparza-Hernández C.N., Elizondo-Omaña R.E., Guzmán-López S. Conduits Used in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Review of Morphological Studies. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;23(2):55-65. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.16-00178
12. Dogan A., Sever K., Mansuroglu D., Hacisalihoglu P., Kurtoglu N. Mönckeberg's arteriosclerosis: a possible reason for non-use of radial conduit. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2019;27(8):685-687. doi: 10.1177/0218492319841977
13. van Son J.A., Smedts F., Vincent J.G., van Lier H.J., Kubat K. Comparative anatomic studies of various arterial conduits for myocardial revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;99(4):703-7
14. Hinojosa-Amaya J.M., Villarreal-Silva E.E., Elizondo-Omaña R.E., JorgeGutiérrez-dela O., Dávila-Canales R., González-Cantú Á., Fernández-Zambrano E.M., Guzmán-López S. Conduits for myocardial revascularization grafts: The importance of morphology and imaging. Med Univ 2010; 12: 115-9.
15. Sisto T. Atherosclerosis in internal mammary and related arteries. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;24(1):7-11. doi: 10.3109/14017439009101814
16. Ozkan S., Akay T.H., Gultekin B., Aslim E., Arslan A., Ozdemir B.H., Becit N., Tasdelen A. Atherosclerosis of radial and internal thoracic arteries used in coronary bypass: atherosclerosis in arterial grafts. J Card Surg. 2007;22(5):385-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2007.00431.x
17. Khot U. N. Radial Artery Bypass Grafts Have an Increased Occurrence of Angiographically Severe Stenosis and Occlusion Compared With Left Internal Mammary Arteries and Saphenous Vein Grafts. Circulation. 2004;109(17): 2086–2091.doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000127570.20508.5c
18. Miwa S., Desai N., Koyama T., Chan E., Cohen E. A., Fremes S. E. Radial Artery Angiographic String Sign: Clinical Consequences and the Role of Pharmacologic Therapy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2006;81(1), 112–119.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.076
19. Nasr A.Y. The radial artery and its variations: anatomical study and clinical implications. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2012;71(4):252-262
20. Zarzecki M.P., Popieluszko P., Zayachkowski A., Pękala P.A., Henry B.M., Tomaszewski K.A. The surgical anatomy of the superficial and deep palmar arches: A Meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(11):1577-1592. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.08.014
21. Manabe S., Tabuchi N., Tanaka H., Arai H., Sunamori M. Hand circulation after radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting. J Med Dent Sci. 2005;52(2):101-107
22. Elwali A., Moussavi Z. The modified Allen test and a novel objective screening algorithm for hand collateral circulation using differential photoplethysmography for preoperative assessment: a pilot study. J Med Eng Technol. 2020;44(2):82-93. doi: 10.1080/03091902.2020.1723729
23. Baikoussis N.G., Papakonstantinou N.A., Apostolakis E. Radial artery as graft for coronary artery bypass surgery: Advantages and disadvantages for its usage focused on structural and biological characteristics. J Cardiol. 2014;63(5):321-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.11.016
24. Gaudino M. Benedetto U., Fremes S., Ballman K., Biondi-Zoccai G., Sedrakyan A., Nasso G., Raman J., Buxton B., Hayward P.A., Moat N., Collins P., Webb C., Peric M., Petrovic I., Yoo K.J., Hameed I., Di Franco A., Moscarelli M., Speziale G., Puskas J.D., Girardi L.N., Hare D.L., Taggart D.P.; RADIAL Investigators. Association of Radial Artery Graft vs Saphenous Vein Graft With Long-term Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020;324(2):179-187. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8228
25. Collins P., Webb C.M., Chong C.F., Moat N.E.; Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Trial Investigators. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation. 2008;117(22):2859-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.736215
26. Nasso G., Coppola R., Bonifazi R., Piancone F., Bozzetti G., Speziale G. Arterial revascularization in primary coronary artery bypass grafting: Direct comparison of 4 strategies--results of the Stand-in-Y Mammary Study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(5):1093-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.10.029
27. Deb S., Cohen E.A., Singh S.K., Une D., Laupacis A., Fremes S.E.; RAPS Investigators. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.037
28. Petrovic I., Nezic D., Peric M., Milojevic P., Djokic O., Kosevic D., Tasic N., Djukanovic B., Otasevic P. Radial artery vs saphenous vein graft used as the second conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization: long-term clinical follow-up. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;10:127. doi: 10.1186/s13019-015-0331-9
29. Hillis L.D., Smith P.K., Anderson J.L., Bittl J.A., Bridges C.R., Byrne J.G., Cigarroa J.E., Disesa V.J., Hiratzka L.F., Hutter A.M. Jr., Jessen M.E., Keeley E.C., Lahey S.J., Lange R.A., London M.J., Mack M.J., Patel M.R., Puskas J.D., Sabik J.F., Selnes O., Shahian D.M., Trost J.C., Winniford M.D. 2011 ACCF/ AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;124(23):e652-735. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823c074e
30. Aldea G.S., Bakaeen F.G., Pal J., Fremes S., Head S.J., Sabik J., Rosengart T., Kappetein A.P., Thourani V.H., Firestone S., Mitchell J.D.; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines on Arterial Conduits for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(2):801-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.100
31. Neumann F.J., Sousa-Uva M., Ahlsson A., Alfonso F., Banning A.P., Benedetto U., Byrne R.A., Collet J.P., Falk V., Head S.J., Jüni P., Kastrati A., Koller A., Kristensen S.D., Niebauer J., Richter D.J., Seferovic P.M., Sibbing D., Stefanini G.G., Windecker S., Yadav R., Zembala M.O.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2019 Oct 1;40(37):3096
32. Royse A., Pamment W., Pawanis Z., Clarke-Errey S., Eccleston D., Ajani A., Wilson W., Canty D., Royse C. Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01433-0
33. Ji Q., Song K., Shen J., Wang Y., Yang Y., Ding W., Xia L., Wang C. Long-Term Patency Rate of Radial Artery Conduits in Chinese Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Int Heart J. 2019;60(6):1276-1283. doi: 10.1536/ihj.18-305
34. Gaudino M., Bakaeen F.G., Benedetto U., Di Franco A., Fremes S., Glineur D., Girardi L.N., Grau J., Puskas J.D., Ruel M., Tam D.Y., Taggart D.P.; ATLANTIC (Arterial Grafting International Consortium) Alliance members. Arterial Grafts for Coronary Bypass: A Critical Review After the Publication of ART and RADIAL. Circulation. 2019;140(15):1273-1284. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041096
35. Frolov A.V. Morphological and functional system of graft-artery junctions. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2019;8(1):112-122. (In Russian) doi: 10.17802/2306-1278-2019-8-1-112-122
36. Deb S., Singh S. K., Moussa F., Tsubota H., Une D., Kiss, A., Tomlinson G., Afshar M., Sless R., Cohen E.A., Radhakrishnan S., Dubbin J., Schwartz L., Fremes S.E.; Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators. The long-term impact of diabetes on graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: A substudy of the multicenter Radial Artery Patency Study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(4), 1246–1253. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.057
37. Otsuka F., Yahagi K., Sakakura K., Virmani R. Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis? Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2(4):519-26. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.07.06
38. Kitamura S. Physiological and metabolic effects of grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery. Circ J. 2011;75(4):766-72. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-10-1302
39. Gaudino M.F.L., Spadaccio C., Taggart D.P. State-of-the-Art Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Patient Selection, Graft Selection, and Optimizing Outcomes. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2019;8(2):173-198. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2018.11.007.
40. Gaudino M.F., Lorusso R., Ohmes L.B., Narula N., McIntire P., Gargiulo A., Bucci M.R., Leonard J., Rahouma M., Di Franco A., He G.W., Girardi L.N., Tranbaugh R.F., Di Lorenzo A. Open radial artery harvesting better preserves endothelial function compared to the endoscopic approach. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019;29(4):561-567. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivz129
41. Dimitrova K.R., Hoffman D.M., Geller C.M., Dincheva G., Ko W., Tranbaugh R.F. Arterial grafts protect the native coronary vessels from atherosclerotic disease progression. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(2): 475-81. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.035
42. Frolov A.V., Kozirin K.A. Composite coronary artery bypass grafting. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2019;8(2):107-115. (In Russian) doi: 10.17802/2306-1278-2019-8-2-107-115
43. Lemma M., Innorta A., Pettinari M. Flow dynamics and wall shear stress in the left internal thoracic artery: composite arterial graft versus single graft. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2006; 29 473-478. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.035
44. Kocayigit I., Cakar M.A., Kahyaoğlu B., Aksoy M.N.M., Tatli E., Akdemir R. The relationship between serum asymmetric dimethylarginine levels and radial artery spasm. Anatol J Cardiol. 2020;23(4):228-232. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.93213
45. Obed D., Fleissner F., Martens A., Cebotari S., Haverich A., Warnecke G., Ismail I. Total Arterial Revascularization with Radial Artery and Internal Thoracic Artery T-Grafts Is Associated with Superior Long-Term Survival in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;26(1):30-39. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.19-00226
46. Al-Bustami M.H., Amrani M., Chester A.H., Ilsley C.J., Yacoub M.H. In vivo early and mid-term flow-mediated endothelial function of the radial artery used as a coronary bypass graft. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(4):573-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01791-0
47. Ikeda M., Ohashi H., Tsutsumi Y., Hige K., Kawai T., Ohnaka M. Angiographic evaluation of the luminal changes in the radial artery graft in coronary artery bypass surgery: a concern over the long-term patency. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21(5):800-3. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00077-5
48. Gaudino M., Prati F., Caradonna E., Trani C., Burzotta F., Schiavoni G., Glieca F., Possati G. Implantation in coronary circulation induces morphofunctional transformation of radial grafts from muscular to elastomuscular. Circulation. 2005;112(9 Suppl):I208-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.512889
Review
For citations:
Frolov A.V. Radial artery – perspective or fallacy? Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2022;11(4S):173-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-4S-173-181