Preview

Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Advanced search

INFLUENCE OF PREVIOUS CATHETER ABLATIONS ON THE EFFICACY OF THORACOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2024-13-3S-87-97

Abstract

Highlights

Despite the widespread use of thoracoscopic ablations in the treatment of atrial fibrillation, accurate predictors of recurrent arrhythmia have not been established, therefore, the effectiveness of this procedure varies significantly (from 38 to 83%). According to clinical guidelines, thoracoscopic ablation should be considered in patients after primary catheter ablation. Several studies have noted that patients with a catheter ablation in history have a significantly higher risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation after thoracoscopic ablation compared with patients without catheter ablation in the 5-year follow-up period. However, our study results indicated similar prevalence of recurrent arrhythmia in patients with and without catheter ablation. Taking into account all of the above, we have evaluated the impact of previous catheter ablations on the effectiveness of thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation in the long-term follow-up period.

 

Aim. To assess the impact of failed pulmonary vein catheter ablation (CA) on the efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic ablation (TSA) in the long-term follow-up period.

Material and Methods. “Box lesion” TSA with left atrial auricle (LAA) exclusion was performed in 47 patients with CA in history and 103 patients without CA. The procedure was considered effective in the absence on 24-h HM ECG of any atrial tachyarrhythmia of more than 30 seconds duration recorded at the examination checkpoints.   

Results. The efficiency of TSA in the group with CA was 61,5% and 77,5% in the group without CA, with a mean follow-up period of 2,6 ± 0,83 years. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses showed that prior CA statistically significantly increased the risks of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence by 1,936-fold (95% CI 1,931–4,026, p = 0,037) and 1,917-fold (95% CI 1,913–4,098, p = 0,042), respectively. 

Conclusion. The study results revealed that previous unsuccessful pulmonary vein CA may reduce the effectiveness of TSA in the long-term follow-up period. However, this topic requires further research involving multivariate analysis on a larger cohort of patients.

About the Authors

Elizaveta D. Strebkova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution “A.V. Vishnevskiy National Medical Research Center of Surgery” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

PhD, Researcher at the Department of Arrhythmology, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution “A.V. Vishnevskiy National Medical Research Center of Surgery” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation



Elena A. Artyukhina
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution “A.V. Vishnevskiy National Medical Research Center of Surgery” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of Electrophysiological and Endovascular Image-guided Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment of Arrhythmias, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution “A.V. Vishnevskiy National Medical Research Center of Surgery” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation; Professor at the Department of Angiology, Cardiovascular, Endovascular Surgery and Arrhythmology named after Academician A.V. Pokrovsky, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation



Madina Kadirova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution “A.V. Vishnevskiy National Medical Research Center of Surgery” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

PhD, Head of the Department of Ultrasound, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution “A.V. Vishnevskiy National Medical Research Center of Surgery” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation



Amiran S. Revishvili
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution “A.V. Vishnevskiy National Medical Research Center of Surgery” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, PhD, Professor, Director of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution “A.V. Vishnevskiy National Medical Research Center of Surgery” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation; Head of the Department of Angiology, Cardiovascular, Endovascular Surgery and Arrhythmology named after Academician A.V. Pokrovsky, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation



References

1. Arakelyan M.G., Bockeria L.A., Vasilieva E.Yu., Golitsyn S.P., Golukhova E.Z., Gorev M.V., Davtyan K.V., Drapkina O.M., Kropacheva E.S., Kuchinskaya E.A., Lajovich L.Yu., Mironov N.Yu., Mishina I.E., Panchenko E.P., Revishvili A.Sh., Rzayev F.G., Tatarsky B.A., Utsumueva M.D., Shakhmatova O.O., Shlevkov N.B., Shpektor A.V., Andreev D.A., Artyukhina E.A., Barbarash O.L., Galyavich A.S., Duplyakov D.V., Zenin S.A., Lebedev D.S., Mikhailov E.N., Novikova N.A., Popov S.V., Filatov A.G., Shlyakhto E.V., Shubik Yu.V. 2020 Clinical guidelines for Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(7):4594. doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4594 (In Russian)

2. Krijthe B.P., Kunst A., Benjamin E.J., Lip G.Y., Franco O.H., Hofman A., Witteman J.C., Stricker B.H., Heeringa J. Projections on the number of individuals with atrial fibrillation in the European Union, from 2000 to 2060. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(35):2746-51. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht280.

3. Kolbin A.S., Mosikyan A.A., Tatarsky B.A. Socioeconomic burden of atrial fibrillations in russia: seven-year trends (2010-2017). Journal of Arrhythmology. 2018;(92):42-48. (In Russian)

4. Hindricks G., Potpara T., Dagres N., Arbelo E., Bax J.J., Blomström-Lundqvist C., Boriani G., Castella M., Dan G.A., Dilaveris P.E., Fauchier L., Filippatos G., Kalman J.M., La Meir M., Lane D.A., Lebeau J.P., Lettino M., Lip G.Y.H., Pinto F.J., Thomas G.N., Valgimigli M., Van Gelder I.C., Van Putte B.P., Watkins C.L.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):507. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa798.

5. Lippi G., Sanchis-Gomar F., Cervellin G. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: An increasing epidemic and public health challenge. Int J Stroke. 2021;16(2):217-221. doi: 10.1177/1747493019897870.

6. Serdechnaya E.V., Tatarsky B.A., Kazakevich E.V. Prevalence and clinical features of atrial fibrillation in the north-west of the russian federation. Clinical Medicine 2009; 87 (1):17-20. (In Russian)

7. Mozaffarian D., Benjamin E.J., Go A.S., Arnett D.K., Blaha M.J., Cushman M., de Ferranti S., Després J.P., et al.; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131(4):e29-322. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152. Epub 2014 Dec 17. Erratum in: Circulation. 2015 Jun 16;131(24):e535. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000219. .

8. Brundel B.J.J.M., Ai X., Hills M.T., Kuipers M.F., Lip G.Y.H., de Groot N.M.S. Atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00347-9.

9. Deitelzweig S., Bergrath E., di Fusco M., Kang A., Savone M., Cappelleri J.C., Russ C., Betts M., Cichewicz A., Schaible K., Tarpey J., Fahrbach K. Real-world evidence comparing oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Future Cardiol. 2022;18(5):393-405. doi: 10.2217/fca-2021-0120.

10. Filatov A. G., Tarashvili E. G. Epidemiology and social significance of atrial fibrillation. Annaly aritmologii. 2012; 9 (2):.5-13. (In Russian)

11. Haïssaguerre M., Jaïs P., Shah D.C., Takahashi A., Hocini M., Quiniou G., Garrigue S., Le Mouroux A., Le Métayer P., Clémenty J. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(10):659-66. doi:10.1056/NEJM199809033391003.

12. Brooks A.G., Stiles M.K., Laborderie J., Lau D.H., Kuklik P., Shipp N.J., Hsu L.F., Sanders P. Outcomes of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(6):835-846. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.01.017

13. Sultan A., Lüker J., Andresen D., Kuck K.H., Hoffmann E., Brachmann J., Hochadel M., Willems S., Eckardt L., Lewalter T., Senges J., Steven D. Predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: data from the German Ablation Registry. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16678. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16938-6

14. Ganesan A.N., Shipp N.J., Brooks A.G., Kuklik P., Lau D.H., Lim H.S., Sullivan T., Roberts-Thomson K.C., Sanders P. Long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(2):e004549. doi:10.1161/JAHA.112.004549

15. Park J.-W., Yu H.T., Kim T.-H., Uhm J.-S., Kim J.-Y., Joung B., Lee M.H., Pak H.N. Trends and outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation over 9 years―focus on empirical extra-pulmonary vein ablation. Circ J 2019;83:304–12.

16. Choi S.H., Yu H.T., Kim D., Park J.W., Kim T.H., Uhm J.S., Joung B., Lee M.H., Hwang C., Pak H.N. Late recurrence of atrial fibrillation 5 years after catheter ablation: predictors and outcome. Europace. 2023;25(5):euad113. doi:10.1093/europace/euad113

17. Marrouche N.F., Wazni O., McGann C., Greene T., Dean J.M., Dagher L., Kholmovski E., Mansour M., Marchlinski F., Wilber D., Hindricks G., Mahnkopf C., Wells D., Jais P., Sanders P., Brachmann J., Bax J.J., Morrison-de Boer L., Deneke T., Calkins H., Sohns C., Akoum N.; DECAAF II Investigators. Effect of MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The DECAAF II Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022;327(23):2296-2305

18. Lin W.S., Tai C.T., Hsieh M.H., Tsai C.F., Lin Y.K., Tsao H.M., Huang J.L., Yu W.C., Yang S.P., Ding Y.A., Chang M.S., Chen S.A. Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation initiated by non-pulmonary vein ectopy. Circulation. 2003;107(25):3176-83. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000074206.52056.2D

19. Hindricks G., Potpara T., Dagres NArbelo E., Bax J.J., Blomström-Lundqvist C., Boriani G., Castella M., Dan G.A., Dilaveris P.E., Fauchier L., Filippatos G., Kalman J.M., La Meir M., Lane D.A., Lebeau J.P., Lettino M., Lip G.Y.H., Pinto F.J., Thomas G.N., Valgimigli M., Van Gelder I.C., Van Putte B.P., Watkins C.L.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):507. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa798.

20. Wolf R.K., Schneeberger E.W., Osterday R., Miller D., Merrill W., Flege J.B.Jr., Gillinov A.M. Video-assisted bilateral pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial appendage exclusion for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130(3):797-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.03.041.

21. Yu C., Li H., Zhang H.. Midterm results of stand-alone thoracoscopic epicardial ablation with box lesion for atrial fibrillation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021;33(3): 354-361. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab148.

22. Boersma L.V., Castella M., van Boven W., Berruezo A., Yilmaz A., Nadal M., Sandoval E., Calvo N., Brugada J., Kelder J., Wijffels M., Mont L. Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation versus surgical ablation treatment (FAST): a 2-center randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2012;125: 23-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.074047.

23. Sindby J.E., Vadmann H., Lundbye-Christensen S., Riahi S., Hjortshøj S., Boersma L.V.A., Andreasen J.J. Percutaneous versus thoracoscopic ablation of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomised controlled trial–the FAST II study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;13(1): 101. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0792-8.

24. Driessen A.H., Berger W.R., Chan Pin Yin D.R., Piersma F.R., Neefs J., van den Berg N.W., Krul S.P., van Boven W.P., de Groot J.R. Electrophysiologically Guided Thoracoscopic Surgery for Advanced Atrial Fibrillation: 5-Year Follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(13):1753-1754. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.035.

25. Wesselink R., Vroomen M., Overeinder I., Neefs J., van den Berg N.W.E., Meulendijks E.R., Piersma F.R., Al-Shama R.F.M., de Vries T.A.C., Verstraelen T.E., Luermans J., Maesen B., de Asmundis C., Chierchia G.B., La Meir M., Pison L., van Boven W.J.P., Driessen A.H.G., de Groot J.R. A failed catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is associated with more advanced remodeling and reduced efficacy of further thoracoscopic ablation. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2023; 76(6):417-426. doi:10.1016/j.rec.2022.09.006

26. Lim S.K., Kim J.Y., On Y.K., Jeong D.S. Mid-Term Results of Totally Thoracoscopic Ablation in Patients with Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation after Catheter Ablation. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 20205;53(5):270-276. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.19.059.

27. Strebkova E.D., Revishvili A.Sh., Malishenko E.S., Artyukhina E.A., Popov V.A., Novikov M.A., Yalova E.V., Bondurko K.E., Karmazanovsky G.G., Kadirova M. Long-term outcomes of thoracoscopic ablation for atrial fibrillation. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2023;30(2):59-69. doi:10.35336/VA-2023-2-08 (In Russian)

28. Revishvili A.Sh., Strebkova E.D., Artyukhina Е.А., Malishenko E.S., Novikov M.A., Kadirova M. The effectiveness of thoracoscopic treatment of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2023;30(3):23-31. doi:10.35336/VA-1160 (In Russian)

29. Revishvili A.Sh., Kadirova M., Strebkova E.D., Malishenko E.S., Novikov M.A., Yalova E.V., Babadjanova K.A., Bandurko K.E., Karmazanovsky G.G. Left atrial appendage exclusion using a stapler with thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2023;12(1):58-71. doi:10.17802/2306-1278-2023-12-1-58-71 (In Russian)

30. Kim J., Jeon K., Park S.J., Jeong D.S., Chung S., Bak M., Kim D., Kim E.K., Chang S.A., Lee S.C., Park S.W. Prognostic implication of left atrial strain in patients experiencing early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after totally thoracoscopic ablation. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;13(1):77-87. doi:10.21037/acs-2023-afm-fs-0031

31. Yu C., Li H., Zhang H., Zheng Z. Midterm results of stand-alone thoracoscopic epicardial ablation with box lesion for atrial fibrillation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021;33(3):354-361. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivab148

32. Zheng Z., Li H., Liu S., Gao G., Yu C., Lin H., Meng Y. Box lesion or bi-atrial lesion set for atrial fibrillation during thoracoscopic epicardial ablation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;34(1):1-8. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivab211

33. van Laar C., Bentala M., Weimar T., Doll N., Swaans M.J., Molhoek S.G., Hofman F.N., Kelder J., van Putte B.P. Thoracoscopic ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a systematic outcome analysis of a multicentre cohort. Europace. 2019;21(6):893-899. doi:10.1093/europace/euy323

34. On Y.K., Park K.M., Jeong D.S., Park P.W., Lee Y.T., Park S.J., Kim J.S. Electrophysiologic Results After Thoracoscopic Ablation for Chronic Atrial Fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Nov;100(5):1595-602; discussion 1602-3. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.127

35. Hwang J.K., Jeong D.S., Gwag H.B., Park K.M., Ahn J., Carriere K., Park S.J., Kim J.S., On Y.K. Staged hybrid procedure versus radiofrequency catheter ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205431. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205431

36. de Asmundis C., Chierchia G.B., Mugnai G., Van Loo I., Nijs J., Czapla J., Conte G., Velagic V., Rodrigues Mañero M., Ciconte G., Ströker E., Umbrain V., Poelaert J., Brugada P., La Meir M. Midterm clinical outcomes of concomitant thoracoscopic epicardial and transcatheter endocardial ablation for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a single-centre experience. Europace. 2017;19(1):58-65. doi:10.1093/europace/euw026


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Strebkova E.D., Artyukhina E.A., Kadirova M., Revishvili A.S. INFLUENCE OF PREVIOUS CATHETER ABLATIONS ON THE EFFICACY OF THORACOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2024;13(3S):87-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2024-13-3S-87-97

Views: 150


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2306-1278 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9537 (Online)