Preview

Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Advanced search

STENTED BIOPROSTHESIS IN AORTIC POSITION: ANALYSIS OF THE EARLY RESULTS BASED ON A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2016-2-14-19

Abstract

Purpose. Retrospective analysis of the immediate results of the treatment of these patients will form an idea of the need for a prospective randomized study.

Materials and methods. Are analyzed the results of 411 operations performed in patients with aortic stenosis. The first group – 227 patients with implanted bioprosthesis in the aortic position UniLine, the second group – 184 patients with implanted stented bioprosthesis Biolab.

Results. Postoperative mortality in group I was 1.8 % (4 patients), in group II – 2.7 % (5 patients) (p=0.8). To determine the factors
that have a connection to the pressure gradient in the aortic prosthesis, regression analysis was performed. In group I, the relationship between the peak pressure gradient and body mass index (p = 0.001). In group II, the relationship peak pressure gradient and stroke volume of the left ventricle, body mass index and diameter of the prosthesis. In group I in the perioperative period required reimplantation valve 1 (0.4 %) patient. Reason dysfunction – iatrogenic damage to the prosthesis. In group II all recorded 3 (1.6 %) early prosthetic dysfunction, including 1 (0.5 %) – iatrogenic and 2 (1 %) – due to the prosthesis itself.

Conclusion. A prospective randomized controlled study conducted over a long period of time, a few clinics at the same time, allow more objectively assess the advantages and disadvantages of dentures and to define prospects of development of this direction in Russia.

About the Authors

A. M. Karaskov
Federal State Budgetary Institution Academician Y. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk, Russia
Russian Federation

Address: 15, Rechkunovskaya st., Novosibirsk, 630055, Russian Federation Tel. +7 (383) 347-60-58



D. A. Astapov
Federal State Budgetary Institution Academician Y. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk, Russia
Russian Federation


D. P. Demidov
Federal State Budgetary Institution Academician Y. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk, Russia
Russian Federation


E. I. Semenova
Federal State Budgetary Institution Academician Y. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk, Russia
Russian Federation


M. V. Isayan
Federal State Budgetary Institution Federal Center of High Medical Technologies. Kaliningrad, Russia
Russian Federation


A. V. Sapegin
Federal State Budgetary Institution Academician Y. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk, Russia
Russian Federation


Y. S. Slastin
Federal State Budgetary Institution Academician Y. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk, Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Barreto-Filho J. A., Wang Y., Dodson J. A., Desai M. M., Sugeng L., Geirsson A. et al. Trends in aortic valve replacement for elderly patients in the United States, 1999–2011. JAMA. 2013; 310 (19): 2078–2085.

2. Бокерия Л. А., Муратов Р. М., Бабенко С. И. Соболева Н. Н., Семенова Е. В. Новый бескаркасный ксеноперикардиальный протез «БиоЛАБ» в хирургии аортального клапана. Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2015; 1: 25–31. Bockeria L. A., Muratov R. M., Babenko S. I., Soboleva N. N., Semenova E. V. A new xenopericardial stentless bioprosthesis «BioLAB» in the surgery of aortic valve. Grudnaya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2015; 1: 25–31. [In Russ.].

3. Azarnoush K., Pereira B., Dualé C., Dorigo E., Farhat M., Innorta A. et al. Comparison between three types of stented pericardial aortic valves (Trivalve trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013; 14: 413.

4. Караськов А. М., Семенов И. И., Астапов Д. А., Семенова Е. И., Железчиков В. Е., Шматов Д. В. Протезирование аортального клапана бескаркасными протезами «Кемерово-АБ-Neo»: первый опыт. Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2010; 3 (5): 62–66. Karas’kov A. M., Semenov I. I., Astapov D. A., Semenova E. I., Zhelezchikov V. E., Shmatov D. V. Aortic valve replacement with stentless prostheticdevices “Kemerovo-ABKomposit Neo”: first experience. Kardiologiya i serdechnososudistaya khirurgiya. 2010; 3 (5): 62–66. [In Russ.].

5. Барбараш Л. С., Стасев А. Н., Кокорин С. Г., Рутковская Н. В., Сизова И. Н. Непосредственные результаты имплантации «клапан в клапан» при дисфункциях биопротезов в митральной позиции. Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2015; 19 (2): 36–41. Barbarash L. S., Stasev A. N., Kokorin S. G., Rutkovskaya N. V., Sizova I. N. Immediate results of mitral valvein-valve implantation for dioprosthetic valve dysfunction. Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya. 2015; 19 (2): 36–41. [In Russ.].

6. Yap K. H., Murphy R., Devbhandari M., Venkateswaran R. Aortic valve replacement: is porcine or bovine valve better? Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2013; 16 (3): 361–373.

7. Broom N. D., Marra D. Effect of glutaraldehyde fixation and valve constraint conditions on porcine aortic valve leaflet coaptation. Thorax. 1982; 37 (8): 620–626.

8. Kim K. M., Herrera G. A., Battarbee H. D. Role of Glutaraldehyde in Calcification of Porcine Aortic Valve Fibroblasts. Am. J. Pathol. 1999; 154 (3): 843–852.

9. Кудрявцева Ю. А., Журавлева И. Ю., Леванова Р. Х., Барбараш Л. С., Гантимурова И. Л. Способ консервации и стерилизации биологических протезов для сердечно-сосудистой хирургии (Патент № 2350075). Method of preservation and sterilization of biological prostheses for cardiovascular surgery (Patent № 2350075). [In Russ.].

10. Караськов А. М., Астапов Д. А., Семенова Е. И., Исаян М. В., Опен А. Б., Демидов Д. П. Отдаленные результаты протезирования аортального клапана бескаркасными биопротезами «Кемерово-АБ-Моно», «Кемерово-АБ-Композит» и «Кемерово-АБ-Нео». Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2011; 4: 23–28. Karaskov A. M., Astapov D. A., Semenova E. I., Isayan M. V., Open A. B., Demidov D. P. Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with «Kemerovo-AB-Mono», «Kemerovo-ABComposite » and «Kemerovo-AB-Neo» stentless bioprosthetic valves. Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya. 2011; 4: 23–28. [In Russ.].

11. Караськов А. М., Семенов И. И., Астапов Д. А., Железчиков В. Е., Семенова Е. И. Биопротезы «КемКор» и «ПериКор» при хирургическом лечении пороков митрального клапана. Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2008; 1: 9–15. Bioprotezy «Kemkor» i «Perikor» pri khirurgicheskom lechenii porokov mitralnogo klapana Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya. 2008; 1: 9–15. [In Russ.].

12. Deutsch M. A., Prinzing A., Fiegl K., Wottke M., Badiu C. C., Krane M. et al. Early haemodynamic performance of a latest generation supra-annular aortic bioprosthesis: experience from a large single-centre series. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2015. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv411.

13. Dell’Aquilaa A. M., Schlarba D., Schneidera S. R. B., Sindermanna J. R., Hoffmeiera A., Kaleschkeb G. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after implantation of the Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis: an initial single-centre experience. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2013; 16: 112–115.

14. Permanyer E., Estigarribia A. J., Ysasi A., Herrero E., Semper O., Llorensa R. St. Jude Medical Trifecta aortic valve perioperative performance in 200 patients. interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2013; 17 (4): 669–672.

15. Cotoni D. A., Palac R. T., Dacey L. J., O’Rourke D. J. Defining patient-prosthesis mismatch and its effect on survival in patients with impaired ejection fraction. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011; 91 (3): 692–699.

16. Dohi M., Doi K., Yaku H. Early stenosis of an aortic porcine bioprosthesis due to thrombosis: Case report and literature review. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2015; 149 (6): 83–86.

17. Leetmaa T., Hansson N. C., Leipsic J., Jensen K., Poulsen S. H., Andersen H. R. et al. Early aortic transcatheter heart valve thrombosis: diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2015; 8 (4). DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.114.001596.

18. Левичева Е. Н., Логинова И. Ю., Окунева Г. Н., Чернявский А. М., Семенов И. И., Астапов Д. А. Сравнительная характеристика качества жизни и физического статуса больных ишемической болезнью сердца и аортальными пороками. Кардиология. 2009; 49 (4): 4–8. Levitcheva E. N., Loginova I. Yu., Okuneva G. N., Chernyavsky A. M., Semenov I. I., Astapov D. A. Comparative Characteristics of Quality of Life and Physical Status of Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease and Aortic Valve Disease. Kardiologia. 2009; 49 (4): 4–8. [In Russ.].


Review

For citations:


Karaskov A.M., Astapov D.A., Demidov D.P., Semenova E.I., Isayan M.V., Sapegin A.V., Slastin Y.S. STENTED BIOPROSTHESIS IN AORTIC POSITION: ANALYSIS OF THE EARLY RESULTS BASED ON A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2016;(2):14-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2016-2-14-19

Views: 631


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2306-1278 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9537 (Online)