THE CURRENT SITUATION AND FUTURE OF THE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROM IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2013-1-5-9
Abstract
The annual incidence of hospital admission for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was 581 182 patients in Russian Federation in 2011. There are 195 592 with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 385 590 – with unstable angina. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were performed for only 4,3 % ACS and 8,8 % AMI patients. There were 62 329 PCIs in the Russian Federation in 2011, and only 24 931 (40 %) were performed for ACS. The Russian Federation goals for ACS treatment were defi ned as follow: existing PCI centres should offer a 24/7 service; short «fi rst medical contact – balloon time» for myocardial infarction with elevation ST STEMI patients; the number of primary PCI should be more than 70 % of all STEMI cases; each STEMI patient after thrombolytic therapy should be transferred to a PCI center during 24 hours.
About the Authors
B. G. Alekyan
Bakoulev Scientifi c Center for Cardiovascular Surgery of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Abrosimov
Bakoulev Scientifi c Center for Cardiovascular Surgery of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Бокерия Л. А., Алекян Б. Г. Рентегенэндоваскулярная диагностика и лечение заболеваний сердца и сосудов в Российской Федерации. М.: НЦССХ им. А. Н. Бакулева РАМН, 2012. 148 с.
2. Чазов Е. И., Руда М. Я. Кардиология. 1987. № 2. C. 5–12.
3. Чазов Е. И. Пути повышения эффективности лечения больных ИБС // Тер. архив. 1997. № 9. С. 5–10.
4. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology/World Heart Federation universal defi nition of myocardial infarction classifi cation system and the risk of cardiovascular death: observations from the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial / M. P. Bonaca [et al.] // Circulation. 2012. Vol. 31 (125(4). P. 577–583.
5. Antoniucci D. [et al.] // Am. J. Cardiol. 2001. № 88, suppl. 15A.
6. Braunwald E. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1992.
7. Clinical and angiographic outcome following implantation of the new less shortening Wallstent in aortocoronary vein grafts: introduction of a second generation stent in the clinical arena / D. Keane [et al.] // J. Intervent. Cardiol. 1994. Vol. 7. P. 557–564.
8. Drug-eluting vs bare metal stents in primary angioplasty / G. De Luca [et al.] // Arch. Intern. Med. 2012. Vol. 172. P. 611–621.
9. For the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. A comparison of primary angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction / C. L. Grines [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. 1993. Vol. 328. P. 673–679.
10. For the STENTIM-2 Investigators. STENTIM-2 hospital outcome: elective Wiktor stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction versus balloon angioplasty [abstract] / L. Maillard [et al.] // Eur. heart J. 1998. Vol. 19. P. 59.
11. GRACE – Gianturco-Roubin stent Acute Closure Evaluation: substrate, challenges and design of a randomized trial of bailout management / D. Keane [et al.] // J. Interven. Cardiol. 1994. Vol. 7. P. 333–339.
12. Granger C. B., Califf R. M., Topol E. J. Thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction // A review. Drugs. 1992. Vol. 44(3). P. 293–325.
13. Grines C. L. Primary angioplasty – the strategy of choice // N. Engl. J. Med. 1996. Vol. 335. P. 1313–1315.
14. Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONSAMI): fi nal 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial / G. W. Stone [et al.] // Lancet. 2011. Vol. 377. P. 2193–2204.
15. Intracoronary stent insertion after balloon angioplasty of chronic total occlusions / S. L. Goldberg [et al.] // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1995. Vol. 26. P. 713–719.
16. Keeley E. C., Boura J. A., Grines C. L. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials // Lancet. 2003. Vol. 361. P. 13–20.
17. Long-term clinical follow-up of patients treated with the self-expanding coronary stent for acute occlusion during balloon angioplasty of the right coronary artery / J. J. Goy [et al.] // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1992. Vol. 19. P. 1593–1596.
18. Marco J., Fajadet J. Seven years of coronary stenting: evolution of therapeutics, techniques and results // Beyar R., G. Keren, M. B. Leon, P. W. Serruys (eds). Frontiers in interventional cardiology. London: Martin Dunitz, 1997. P. 83–94.
19. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with and without thrombolytic therapy for treatment of acute myocardial infarction / G. O. Hartzler [et al.] // Am. Heart J. 1983. Vol. 106 (5 Pt 1). P. 965–973.
20. Prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions: the medical approach / S. Rosanio [et al.] // Thromb. Haemost. 2005. Vol. 82 (1). P. 164–170.
21. Self expanding stents for the management of aortoostial stenoses in saphenous vein bypass grafts / J. E. Nordrehaug [et al.] // Br. Heart J. 1994. Vol. 72. P. 285–287.
22. Serial antiplatelet effects of combined treatment with ticlopidine and aspirine after stent implantation [abstract] / J. P. Preiss [et al.] // Circulation. 1996. Vol. 94. P. 685.
23. Short- and long-term clinical and quantitative angiographic results with the new less shortening Wallstent for vessel reconstruction in chronic total occlusion: a quantitative angiographic study / Y. Ozaki [et al.] // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1996. Vol. 28. P. 354–360.
24. Stone G. W. Primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: the promise and the proof // Circulation. 2004. Vol. 97. P. 2482–2485.
25. Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes / L. Wallentin [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. 2009. Vol. 361. P. 1045–1057.
26. Zalewski J., El-Massri N., Klimeczek P. The Predictive Value of Microvascular Obstruction in Determination of Left Venticular Injury and Function after Primary Coronary Angioplasty // Am. J. Cardiol. 2004. Vol. 94 (l 6A). P. 17E.
Review
For citations:
Alekyan B.G., Abrosimov A.V. THE CURRENT SITUATION AND FUTURE OF THE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROM IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2013;(1):5-9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2013-1-5-9
Views:
1179
