CHOICE OF SURGICAL STRATEGY IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS AND CONCOMITANT CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2016-3-43-51
Abstract
The article presents analytical review of literature data on the problem of combined lesions of the aortic valve and coronary arteries. It outlines the current views on the assessment approach to the selection of methods and volume of surgical intervention and reflects the current state of the problem of endovascular treatment of patients with concomitant coronary artery in patients with severe aortic stenosis in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
About the Authors
D. D. Zubarev
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. A. Khelimskii
Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт патологии кровообращения имени академика Е. Н. Мешалкина, Новосибирск
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. V. Krestyaninov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. S. Grankin
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. I. Kretov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
For correspondence: Kretov Evgenyi Address: 15, Rechkunovskaya st.,Novosibirsk, 630055, Russian Federation Tel.: +7-913-790-65-33 E-mail: sibvolna2005@yandex.ru
R. U. Ibragimov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. I. Baistrukov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. M. Kim
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Marchenko
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. A. Redkin
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. A. Naryshkin
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
R. A. Naidenov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. A. Pokushalov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. M. Karaskov
Academician Ye. Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology. Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Vandeplas A., Willems J. L., Piessens J., De Geest H. Frequency of angina pectoris and coronary artery disease in severe isolated valvular aortic stenosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 1988; 62: 117–120.
2. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J. G. Improving assessment of aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012; 60: 169–180.
3. Stewart B. F., Siscovick D., Lind B. K., Gardin J. M., Gottdiener J. S., Smith V. E. et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1997; 29: 630–634.
4. Lung B. Interface between valve disease and ischaemic heart disease. Heart. 2000; 84: 347–352.
5. Бокерия Л. А., Гудкова Р. Г. Сердечно-сосудистая хирургия – 2014. НЦ. ССХ им. А. Н. Бакулева РАМН. М.; 2015. Bokeriya L. A., Gudkova R. G. Serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya – 2014. NTs. SSKh im. A. N. Bakuleva RAMN. Moskow; 2015.
6. Adler Y., Vaturi M., HerzI., Iakobishvili Z., Toaf J., FinkN. et al. Nonobstructive aortic valve calcification: a window to significant coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2002; 161: 193–197.
7. Kvidal P., Bergstrom R., Horte L. G., Stahle E. Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000; 35: 747–756.
8. Roberts W. C. Morphologic features of the normal and abnormal mitral valve. Am. J. Cardiol. 1983; 51: 1005–1028.
9. Thubrikar M. J., Deck J. D., Aouad J., Chen J. M. Intramural stress as a causative factor in atherosclerotic lesions of the aortic valve. Atherosclerosis. 1985; 55: 299–311.
10. Vahanian A., Baumgartner H., Bax J., Butchart E., Dion R., Filippatos G. et al. Task Force on the Management of Valvular Hearth Disease of the European Society of Cardiology, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur. Heart. J. 2012; 33: 2451–2496.
11. Aranki S., Rizzo R., Couper G., Adams D., Collins J., Gildea J. et al. Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: effect of gender and coronary artery disease on operative mortality. Circulation. 1992; 88: 17–23.
12. Dewey T. M., Brown D. L., Herbert M. A., Culica D., Smith C. R., Leon M. B. et al. Effect of concomitant coronary artery disease on procedural and late outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2010; 89: 758–767.
13. Nishimura R. A., Otto C. M., Bonow R. O., Carabello B. A., Erwin J. P., Guyton R. A. et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014; 14: 735–1097.
14. Hannan E. L., Wu C., Bennett E. V. et al. Risk index for predicting in-hospital mortality for cardiac valve surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007; 83: 921–929.
15. Nowicki E. R., Birkmeyer N. J., Weintraub R. W. et al. Multivariable prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with aortic and mitral valve surgery in northern New England. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2004; 77: 1966–1977.
16. Kuduvalli M., Grayson A. D., Au J., Grotte G., Bridgewater B., Fabri B. M. A multi-centre additive and logistic risk model for in-hospital mortality following aortic valve replacement. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2007; 31: 607–613.
17. Beach J. M., Mihaljevic T., Svensson L. G., Rajeswaran J., Marwick T., Griffin B. et al. Coronary artery disease and outcomes of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013; 61: 837–848.
18. Goel S. S., Agarwal S., Tuzcu E. M., Ellis S. G., Svensson L. G., Zaman T. et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2012; 125: 1005–1013.
19. Paradis J. M., Fried J., Nazif T., Kirtane A., Harjai K., Khalique O. et al. Aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: What do we know? What don′t we know? A comprehensive review of the literature with proposed treatment algorithms European. Heart. Journal. 2014; 35: 2069–2082. DOI:10.1093/ eurheartj/ehu247.
20. Byrne J. G., Leacche M., Unic D., Rawn J. D., Simon D. I., Rogers C. D. et al. Staged initial percutaneous coronary intervention followed by valve surgery (‘hybrid approach’) for patients with complex coronary and valve disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005; 45: 14–18.
21. Brinster D. R., Byrne M., Rogers C. D., Baim D. S., Simon D. I., Couper G. S. et al.. Effectiveness of same day percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and moderate coronary disease (‘hybrid approach’). Am. J. Cardiol. 2006; 98: 1501–1503.
22. Santana O., Funk M., Zamora C., Escolar E., Lamas G. A., Lamelas J. Staged percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive valve surgery: results of a hybrid approach to concomitant coronary and valvular disease. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012; 144: 634–639.
23. Leon M. B., Smith C. R., Mack M. et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010; 363: 1597– 1607.
24. Smith C. R., Leon M. B., Mack M. J. et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011; 364: 2187–2198.
25. Gilard M., Eltchaninoff H., Iung B. et al. Registry of transcatheter aortic-valve implantation in high-risk patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012; 366: 1705–1715.
26. Dewey T. M., Brown D. L., Das T. S. et al. High-risk patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: management and outcomes. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008; 86: 1450–1456.
27. Kapadia S. R., Goel S. S., Svensson L. et al. Characterization and outcome of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2009; 137: 1430–1435.
28. Gasparetto V., Fraccaro C., Tarantini G., Buja P., D’Onofrio A., Yzeiraj E. et al. Safety and effectiveness of a selective strategy for coronary artery revascularization before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2013; 81: 376–383.
29. Abdel-Wahab M., Mostafa A. E., Geist V. et al. Comparison of outcomes in patients having isolated transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus combined with preprocedural percutaneous coronary intervention. Am. J. Cardiol. 2012; 109: 581–586.
30. Mostafa A. E., Geist V., Abdel-Wahab M. Ad-hoc percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve implantation as a combined transfemoral procedure. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2011; 23: 102–105.
31. Pasic M., Dreysse S., Unbehaun A. et al. Combined elective percutaneous coronary intervention and transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2012; 14: 463–468.
32. Wenaweser P., Pilgrim T., Guerios E. et al. Impact of coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention on outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2011; 7: 541–548.
33. Попов В. А., Ганюков В. И., Козырин К. А., Хаес Б. Л., Григорьев Е. В., Моисеенков Г. В., Барабаш Л. С. Малоинвазивный гибридный подход к реваскуляризации миокарда. Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2013; 6 (6): 4–8. Popov V. A., Ganyukov V. I., Kozyrin K. A., Khaes B. L., Grigor′ev E. V., Moiseenkov G. V., Barabash L. S. Maloinvazivnyy gibridnyy podkhod k revaskulyarizatsii miokarda. Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2013; 6 (6): 4–8.
Review
For citations:
Zubarev D.D., Khelimskii D.A., Krestyaninov O.V., Grankin D.S., Kretov E.I., Ibragimov R.U., Baistrukov V.I., Kim E.M., Marchenko A.V., Redkin D.A., Naryshkin I.A., Naidenov R.A., Pokushalov E.A., Karaskov A.M. CHOICE OF SURGICAL STRATEGY IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS AND CONCOMITANT CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2016;(3):43-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2016-3-43-51
Views:
740
