Clinical success of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation

Aim. To estimate the clinical success of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Methods. 230 patients (males: 49.6%, mean age 57 (53; 62) with symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy were included in a single-center prospective study. The patients were randomized into 2 groups to undergo either cryoballoon ablation (n = 122) or radiofrequency (RF) (n = 108) ablation. Both groups were comparable in baseline parameters. The follow-up period was 12 months. Clinical outcomes were estimated with the use of a three-stage scale. The rates of cardiovascular rehospitalizations, direct-current cardioversions and repeated ablations during were estimated within the follow-up. The quality of life (QoL) in the cryoablation group was measured using the AFEQT scale.

Results. 77% (n = 94) of patients in the cryoballoon ablation group and 71.3% (n = 77) of patients in the RF group (р = 0.71) demonstrated reported the optimal clinical effects. Both groups, cryo ablation and RF ablation, had similar rates of cardiovascular hospitalizations (23.8 vs 28.7%, OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4–1.4; р = 0.39), direct-current cardioversions (12.3 vs 17.6%, OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3–1.4; р = 0.26) and repeated ablations (9.8–11.1%, OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.4–2.0; р = 0.75). The patients treated with cryoballoon as opposed to RF ablation had significantly more successful usage of “pill-in-pocket” strategy – 14.8 vs 6.5% (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.01–6.2; р = 0.04). Significant improvements of the QoL parameters with strong size effect have been found in the cryoablation group, i.e. global score (GS) increased by 8.9±6.9 (95% CI 6.6–10.1; dCohen 1.2; р<0.001), symptoms (S) – by 8.3±7.9 (95% CI 4.2–8.8; dCohen 1.5; р<0.001), daily activities (DA) – by 10.0±6.9 (95% CI = 6.4–10.6; dCohen 0.9; р<0.001), treatment concerns (TC) – by 5.5±6.0 (95% CI 6.3–9.2; dCohen 1.2; р<0.001) and treatment satisfaction (TS) – by 5.5±6.0 (95% CI 5.4–9.8; dCohen 0.9; р<0.001).

Conclusion. The both catheter-based technologies had comparable clinical success. Cryoablation was characterized by improvement in all QoL parameters based on the AFEQT score.

1. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Available at: http://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271(17)30590-8/fulltext. (accessed 06.12.2018).

2. Kirchhof P., Benussi S., Kotecha D., Ahlsson A., Atar D., Casadei B., et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37 (38): 2893-2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210

3. Mamchur I.N., Chichkova T.Y., Karetnikova V.N., Mamchur S.E., Romanova M.P. Left atrial mechanical function and its disorders after pulmonary vein antrum isolation. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2018;7(2):137-145. (In Russian) doi: https:// doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2018-7-2-137-145

4. Montbleau K.E., King D., Henault L., Magnani J.W. Health literacy, health-related quality of life and atrial fibrillation. Cogent Med. 2017; 4: 1412121. doi: 10.1080/2331205X.2017.1412121 (11.12.2017).

5. Romero J. R., Wolf P. A. Epidemiology of Stroke: Legacy of the Framingham Heart Study. Glob Heart.2013; 8 (1): 67-75.

6. Stewart S., Murphy N.F., A. Walker A., McGuire A., McMurray J.J.V. Cost of an emerging epidemic: an economic analysis of atrial fibrillation in the UK. Heart. 2004; 90(3): 286–292.

7. Reynolds M.R., Lamotte M., Todd D., Khaykin Y, Eggington S, Tsintzos S, Klein G.Cost-effectiveness of cryoballoon ablation for the management of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2014; 16(5): 652-659. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut380.

8. Verma A., Champagne J., Sapp J., Essebag V, Novak P, Skanes A, Morillo CA, Khaykin Y, Birnie D. Discerning the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation before and after catheter ablation (DISCERN AF): a prospective, multicenter study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173(2): 149-156. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1561.

9. Chichkova T.Yu., Mamchur S.E., Ivanitsky E.A., Bokhan N.S., Kropotkin E.B., Khomenko E.A., Romanova M.P. Comparison of effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation of atrial fibrillation based on the experience of two clinical centers. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2017; 88: 30-35. (In Russian)

10. Kuck K.H., Brugada J., Furnkranz A. et al. Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016; Vol. 374(23): 2235-2245.

11. Gorbunova E.V., Gorshkova T.V., Romanova M.P., Makarov S.A. Impact of a learning program on the psychological aspects of quality of life in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv. 2012;84(11): 42-46. (In Russian)

12. Kuck K.H., Furnkranz A., Chun K.R., Metzner A., Ouyang F., Schlüter M., Elvan A. et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reintervention, rehospitalization, and quality-of-life outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(38): 2858-2865. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw285

13. Bai Y., Bai R., Wu J.H. , Zhang T., Liu N., Shi X.-B., Liu X.-Y. et al. Differences in Quality of Life Between Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Low Stroke Risk Treated With and Without Catheter Ablation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015; 16;4(9): e002130. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002130

14. Raine D., Langley P., Shepherd E., Lord S., Murray S., Murray A., Bourke J.P. Effect of catheter ablation on quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation and its correlation with arrhythmia outcome. Open Heart. 2015; 10;2(1): e000302. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000302.

15. R. Mantovan, L. Macle, G. De Martino, Chen J., Morillo C.A., Novak P. et al. Relationship of quality of life with procedural success of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and postablation AF burden: substudy of the STAR AF randomized trial. Can J Cardiol. 2013; 29(10): 12111217. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.06.006.