Historical aspects and the current state of treatment of combined coronary and carotid artery disease
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2020-9-1-74-81
Abstract
In this study the primary focus will be on the problem of choosing the treatment tactic in patients with multifocal atherosclerosis. Nowadays, optimal timing of surgical interventions in these patients is controversial. In clinical practice it is usually determined by the severity of the combined coronary and carotid artery disease and the symptoms in patients. There are two main strategies: a staged approach, in which the most affected arteries are primarily revascularized, and a synchronous approach, in which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary revascularization are performed simultaneously. The presence of severe carotid artery disease is an important incremental risk factor for myocardial infraction after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and needs either concomitant or staged surgical correction. In the absence of randomized controlled trials, guidelines regarding the management of these patients are based on data from single-center retrospective studies. The article indicates historical aspects and current research on multifocal atherosclerosis, as well as clinical guidelines for the management of these patients
About the Authors
A. V. Marchenko
Federal Centre of Cardiovacular Surgery named after S.G. Sukhanov of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marchenko Andrei V.- PhD, cardiovascular surgeon at the Federal Centre of Cardiovacular Surgery named after S.G. Sukhanov of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
35, Marshala Zhukova St., Perm, Russian Federation, 614000
A. S. Vronskiy
Perm State Medical University named after academician E.A. Wagner of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vronskiy Alexei S.- resident at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventional Cardiology, Perm State Medical University named after academician E.A. Wagner of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
26, Petropavlovskaya St., Perm, Russian Federation, 614000;
P. A. Myalyuk
Federal Centre of Cardiovacular Surgery named after S.G. Sukhanov of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Myalyuk Pavel A.- cardiovascular surgeon at the Federal Centre of Cardiovacular Surgery named after S.G. Sukhanov of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
35, Marshala Zhukova St., Perm, Russian Federation, 614000
M. S. Kamenskikh
Clinic of High Medical Technologies named after N.I. Pirogov at the Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kamenskikh Maxim S.- cardiovascular surgeon at the Clinic of High Medical Technologies n.a. N.I. Pirogov at the Saint Petersburg State University.
154, Fontanka Qy. Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 190103
References
1. Naylor A.R. Managing patients with symptomatic coronary and carotid artery disease. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2010; 22: 70–76. doi: 10.1177/1531003510381134
2. P.W. Serruys, M.C. Morice, P. Kappetein, Colombo A., Holmes D.R., Mack M.J. et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(10): 961-972. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626
3. Naylor, A.R., Mehta, Z., Rothwell, P.M., Bell, P.R. Carotid artery disease and stroke during coronary artery bypass: a critical review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002; 23: 283–294. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1609
4. Reul G.J., Morris G.C., Howell J.F., Crawford E.S., Stelter W.Y. Current concepts in coronary artery surgery: A critical analysis of 1287 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;14:243–259. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65227-7
5. Bernhard V.M., Johnson W.D., Peterson J.J. Carotid artery stenosis: Association with surgery for coronary artery disease. Arch Surg. 1972; 105 (5), pp. 837-840. DOI: 10.1001/ archsurg.1972.04180120018005
6. Naylor A.R. , Cuffe R.L. , Rothwell P.M. , Bell P.R. A systematic review of outcomes following staged and synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003; 25 (5): 380-389. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1895
7. Aboyans V., Ricco J.-B., Bartelink M.-L., Björck M., Brodmann M., Cohnert T., Collet J.-P. et al; ESC Scientific Document Group2017 ESC/ESVS. Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the european society for vascular surgery. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39 (9): 763-816. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095
8. Paraskevas K.I., Nduwayo S., Saratzis A., Bown M.J., Naylor A.R. Carotid stenting and coronary bypass surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017;53:309–319. doi: 10.1016/j. ejvs.2016.12.019
9. Naylor, A.R., Cuffe, R.L., Rothwell, P.M., Loftus, I.M., Bell, P.R. A systematic review of outcome following synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass: influence of surgical and patient variables. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;26: 230–241. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1975
10. Gopaldas R.R., Chu D., Dao T.K., Huh J., LeMaire S.A., Lin P., Coselli J.S., Bakaeen F. G. Staged Versus Synchronous Carotid Endarterectomy and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Analysis of 10-Year Nationwide Outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 91 (5): 1323-1329. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.053
11. Sharma V., Deo S.V., Park S.J., Joyce L.D. MetaAnalysis of Staged Versus Combined Carotid Endarterectomy and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 97 (1): 102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.091
12. Shishehbor M.H., Venkatachalam S., Sun Z., Rajeswaran J., Kapadia S.R., Bajzer C. et al. A Direct Comparison of Early and Late Outcomes With Three Approaches to Carotid Revascularization and Open Heart Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62 (21): 1948-1956. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.094
13. Feldman D.N., Swaminathan R.V., Geleris J.D., Okin P., Minutello R.M., Krishnan U. et. al. Comparison of Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes of Concurrent Carotid Artery Revascularization and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: The United States Experience 2004 to 2012. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 13;10(3):286-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.032
14. Belov YU.V., Kuz'min A.L. Karotidnaya endarterektomiya pod mestnoj anesteziej u bol'nyh s izolirovannymi i sochetannymi porazheniyami brahiocefal'nyh arterij. Angiologiya i sosudistaya hirurgiya. 2002; 8(3): 76 – 80. (In Russian)
15. Chernyavsky A.M., Karaskov A.M., Mironenko S.P., Kovlyakov V.A. Surgical correction of multifocal atherosclerosis. The Bulletin of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2006; 26 (2): 126-131. (In Russian)
16. Bendov D., Naimushin A.V., Bakanov A.U., Gordeev M.L. Simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with bilateral carotid stenosis. Arterial’naya Gipertenziya. 2009; 15 (4): 502-506. (In Russian)
17. Ivanov S.V., Sumin A.N., Kazachek Y.V., Philipiev D.E., Gusev S.M., Malyshenko E.S., Barbarash L.S. Options for revascularization outcomes optimization in patients with polyvascular disease. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2013; (3):26-35. (In Russian). https://doi. org/10.17802/2306-1278-2013-3-26-35
18. Kuznetsov M.S., Kozlov B.N., Nasrashvili G.G., Panfilov D.S., Plotnikov M.P., Andriyanova A.V., Shipulin V.M. Analysis of the surgical outcomes of combined athersclerotic lesions of carotid and coronary arteries. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2016;(3):35-42. (In Russian) https:// doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2016-3-35-42
19. Chernyavsky A.M., Edemsky A.G., Chernyavsky M.A., Vinogradova T.E. Hybrid technologies in surgical treatment of patients with concomitant atherosclerotic lesions of carotid and coronary arteries. Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya. 2013;17(1):45-53. (In Russian) doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2013-1-45-53
20. Schneider Yu.A., Tsoi V.G., Pavlov A.A. Immediate and intermediate results of staged carotid endarterectomy in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting. Angiology and vascular surgery. 2019;25(3):95-100. doi: 10.33529/ ANGIO2019304 (In Russian)
21. L.A. Bokeria, I.Yu. Sigaev, N.A. Darvish, A.A. Ozolinsh, M.F. Eseneev, E.B. Mollaev, R.R. Valieva, I.A. Gvetadze. Treatment tactics for patients with combined atherosclerotic lesions of brachiocephalic and coronary arteries. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2016;116(2):22-28. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20161162122-28 (In Russian)
22. 2011ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/CNS/SAIP/ SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS. Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease. Circulation. 2011; 124 (4): 489-532. doi: 10.1161/ CIR.0b013e31820d8d78
23. 2014ESC/EACTS. Guidelines on myocardial Revascularization. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed With the Special Contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 46 (4),: 517-592. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu366
24. Neumann F.-J., Sousa-Uva M., Ahlsson A., Alfonso F., Banning A.P., Benedetto U., ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40 (2), 87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
25. Национальные рекомендации по ведению пациентов с заболеваниями брахиоцефальных артерий. Режим доступа: www. url: http://www.angiolsurgery.org/ recommendations/2013/recommendations_brachiocephalic.pdf (дата обращения 03.02.2020).
Review
For citations:
Marchenko A.V., Vronskiy A.S., Myalyuk P.A., Kamenskikh M.S. Historical aspects and the current state of treatment of combined coronary and carotid artery disease. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2020;9(1):74-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2020-9-1-74-81
Views:
759
