SELECTION OF POLYMER FOR STENT-GRAFT COATING IN TERMS OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY AND BIODEGRADATION CHARACTERISTICS
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2024-13-4-77-89
Abstract
Highlights
Coated stents or stent-grafts are widely used in endovascular surgery to close arterial perforations, dissections and aneurysms, as well as in stenting of arteries with loose atherosclerotic plaques in order to reduce the risk of emboli and strokes. The material of stent coating is of great importance in the prevention of early thrombosis and restenosis of stent grafts. Biodegradable polymers have an advantage over non-biodegradable polymers because they do not remain in the patient's tissues for a long period of time and do not cause chronic inflammation. The study of the dynamics and biodegradation characteristics of polymer coating can provide information about its suitability and safety in the stent graft.
Annotation
Aim. To screen potentially suitable polymers for stent-graft coating with the following assessment of biocompatibility and biodegradation dynamics in an in vivo experiment.
Methods. The coating was applied on the stent by electrospinning from a solution of polymers: Polycaprolactone (PCL); polydioxanone (PDO); polylactide-co-caprolactone (P(LA/CL)) with lactide: caprolactone ratio – 70:30; polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) with lactide: glycolide ratio – 50:50. Chloroform (CHCl3) and 1,1,1,1,3,3,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFP) were used as a solvent. Gore-Tex polymer membrane made of polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) was used as control. In order to evaluate biocompatibility and biodegradation dynamics in vivo, the studied polymeric samples were implanted subcutaneously in male Wistar rats for periods of 7 and 14 days, 1, 2, 3 and 6 months. After explantation all samples were studied histologically.
Results. 14 days after implantation a moderate inflammatory reaction developed on all polymer specimens. The PTFE material was separated from the surrounding tissues by a thin ordered fibrous capsule, confirming its satisfactory biocompatible properties. The porous structure of PCL membranes was filled by fibroblasts and the specimens were tightly integrated into the surrounding tissues. P(LA/CL) degrades with the formation of large fragments. The composite polymer P(LA/CL)/PDO degraded to form small fragments that are tightly integrated with the fibrous capsule. PLGA membranes showed high rates of degradation - membrane fragments were detected 3 months after implantation, after 6 months the samples were completely degraded.
Conclusion. The results of biocompatibility and biodegradation assessment in vivo indicate that the most promising polymers for stent-graft creation are PCL, PLGA and composite polymer P(LA/CL)/PDO. In order to finalize the choice of polymer, it is necessary to conduct further studies to assess the biocompatibility and degradation of polymer coating during implantation of stent-grafts into the arterial bed of large laboratory animals.
About the Authors
Amin R. ShabaevRussian Federation
Junior Researcher at the Laboratory of Cell Technologies, Department of Experimental Medicine, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases”, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Anastasia Yu. Kanonykina
Russian Federation
Junior Researcher at the Laboratory of Molecular, Translational and Digital Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases”, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Lev A. Bogdanov
Russian Federation
PhD, Researcher at the Laboratory of Molecular, Translational and Digital Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases”, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Daria K. Shishkova
Russian Federation
PhD, Head of the Laboratory of Molecular, Translational and Digital Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases”, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Yulia A. Kudryavtseva
Russian Federation
PhD, Chief Researcher at the Department of Experimental Medicine, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases”, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
References
1. Alekyan B.G., Grigoryan A.M., Staferov A.V., Karapetyan N.G. Endovascular diagnostics and treatment in the Russian Federation (2017). Endovaskulyarnaya Khirurgiya. Russian Journal of Endovascular Surgery. 2018;5(2, Special Iss.):93-240. doi: 10.24183/2409-4080-2018-5-2-93-240 (In Russian)
2. Krichman M.D., Travin N.O., Gazaryan G.G., Semitko S.P., Klimovsky S.D. Stenting of the carotid arteries in the treatment of patients with high perioperative risk. Bulletin of Pirogov national medical and surgical Centery. 2022; 17(3):101-108. doi: 10.25881/20728255_2022_17_3_101 (In Russian)
3. Luo J., Wang T., Gao P., Krings T., Jiao L. Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: Current Debates and Future Prospects. Front Neurol. 2018; 9: 666. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00666
4. Lin Y., Quan J., Dong J., Cong L., Yang L. The Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy for Femoropopliteal Lesions via Drug-Coated Balloon, Directional Atherectomy and Bare Metal Stent Angioplasty. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024;25(9):331. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2509331.
5. Kim Y., Kim J. H., Kim J. H., Kim G. H., Ko H.-K., Chu H. H., Shin J. H., Gwon D.I., Ko G.-Y. Stent-Graft Placement for Hepatic Arterial Hemorrhage after Pancreaticobiliary Surgery: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:963–970. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2024.03.020
6. Lemmert M.E., R.J., R., J.M., de Jaegere P.P., Zijlstra F., Daemen J., Van Mieghem N.M. Clinical Characteristics and Management of Coronary Artery Perforations: A Single-Center 11-Year Experience and Practical Overview. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(9):e007049. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007049.
7. Harnek J., James S., Lagerqvist B. Coronary Artery Perforation and Tamponade ― Incidence, Risk Factors, Predictors and Outcomes From 12 Years’ Data of the SCAAR RegistryCirculation Journal Circ J 2020; 84: 43–53 doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0757
8. Nagaraja V., Schwarz K., Moss S., Kwok C.S., Gunning M. Outcomes of patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with covered stents for coronary perforation: A systematic review and pooled analysis of data. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(7):1360-1366. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28646.
9. Pokalenko E.A., Dultsev K.N., Kulesh A.A., Drobakha V.E., Karakulov O.G., Shestakov V.V. Carotid artery stenting in cervical dissection. Russian neurological journal. 2019;(4):23-30. doi.10.30629/2658-7947-2019-24-4-23-30 (In Russian)
10. Klestov K.B., Kulikov Yu.V., Sultanov I.R., Komisarova N.V., Ivanov A.V., Matveev A.A., Morozov D.V. Complications of carotid stenting. International Journal of Interventional Cardioangiology. 2017; 48/49: 49-50. (In Russian)
11. Kokov L.S., Bolomatov N.V. Endovascular surgery – technology and practices. Moscow: RAS. 2021 (In Russian)
12. Parikh P., Banerjee K., Sammour Y., Ali A.F., Sankaramangalam K., Nair R, Ellis S., Raymond R., Tuzcu E.M., S. Utilization and outcomes of polytetrafluoroethylene covered stents in patients with coronary artery perforation and coronary artery aneurysm: Single center 15-year experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94(4):555-561. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28448
13. Nagaraja V., Schwarz K., Moss S., Kwok C.S., Gunning M. Outcomes of patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with covered stents for coronary perforation: A systematic review and pooled analysis of data. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(7):1360-1366. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28646.
14. Kufner S., Schaher N., Ferenc M.C. Hoppmann P., Abdel-Wahab M., Mayer K., Fusaro M., Byrne R.A., Kastrati A. Outcome after new generation single-layer polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent implantation for the treatment of coronary artery perforation. Catheter Cardiovasc Inerv. 2019; 93(5): 912-920. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27979
15. Cassano R., Perri P., Esposito A., Intrieri F., Sole R., Curcio F., Trombino S. Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Membranes for Vascular Stent Coating: Manufacturing, Biomedical and Surgical Applications, Innovations and Case Reports. Membranes. 2023; 13(2): 240; doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020240
16. Secco G.G., Serdoz R., Kilic I.D., Caiazzo G., Mattesini A., Parisi R., De LucaG., G., Marino P.N. , C. Indications and immediate and long-term results of a novel pericardium covered stent graft: Consecutive 5-year single center experience. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2015; 87(4): 712–719. doi:10.1002/ccd.26131
17. Kandzari D.E., Birkemeyer, R. PK Papyrus covered stent: Device description and early experience for the treatment of coronary artery perforations. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2019; doi:10.1002/ccd.28306
18. Glushkova T.V., Ovcharenko E.A., Sevostyanova V.V., Klyshnikov K.Yu. Features of Calcification of Valves Heart and Their Biological Prostheses: Composition, Structure and Localization of Calcifications. Kardiologiia. 2018;58(5):72-81. doi.10.18087/cardio.2018.5.10110 (In Russian)
19. Wu C., An Q., Li D., Jing W. A novel heparin loaded poly(l-lactide-co-caprolactone) covered stent for aneurysm therapy. Materials Letters. 2014; 116: 39–42. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.018
20. Nasr S.M., Rabiee N., Hajebi S., Ahmadi S., Fatahi Y., Hosseini M. Bagherzadeh M., Ghadiri A.M., Rabiee M., Jajarmi V., Webster T.J. Biodegradable Nanopolymers in Cardiac Tissue Engineering: From Concept Towards Nanomedicine/ Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:4205–4224. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S245936
21. Ulery B.D., Nair L.S., Laurencin C.T. Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics. 2011; 49(12): 832–864. doi:10.1002/polb.22259
22. Biocompatible materials: textbook. Eds V.I.. Sevastyanov, M.P. Kirpichnikov. Moscow: LLC Publishing House “Medical Information Agency”; 2011. (In Russian)
23. Nagaraja V., Schwarz K., Moss S., Kwok C.S., Gunning M. Outcomes of patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with covered stents for coronary perforation: A systematic review and pooled analysis of data/ Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(7):1360-1366. doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28646
24. Kim Н.I., Ishihara K., Lee S., Seo J-H., Kim H.Y., Suh D., Kim M.U., Konno T., Takai M., Seo J.-S. Tissue response to poly (L-lactic acid)-based blend with phospholipid polymer for biodegradable cardiovascular stents. Biomaterials. 2011;32(9):2241-2247. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.067
25. Cai W., Chen E., Zheng H., Hu D., Wu L., Zeng X., Huang J., Chen L. Mid-Term Outcomes of Novel Covered Stent with Biodegradable Membrane in Porcine Coronary Artery Perforation Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023;24(7):197. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2407197.
26. Maiborodin I.V., Kuznetsova I.V., Beregovoy E.A., Shevela A.I., Barannik M.I., Manayev A.A., Maiborodina V.I. Tissue reactions during the degradation of polylactide implants in the body. Morphology. 2013. 143 (3):59-65. (In Russan)
27. Parara S.M., Manios A., de Bree E., Tosca A., Tsiftsis D.D. Significant differences in skin irritation by common suture materials assessed by a comparative computerized objective method. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011; 127, 3: 1191–1198. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182043aa6
28. Thomas V., Donahoe T., Nyairo E., Dean D.R., Vohra Y.K. Electrospinning of Biosyn(®)-based tubular conduits: structural, morphological, and mechanical characterizations. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(5):2070-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.008
29. Pamula E., MenaszekE. In vitro and in vivo degradation of poly (L-lactide-co-glycolide) films and scaffolds. J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2008) 19:2063–2070 doi 10.1007/s10856-007-3292-2
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Shabaev A.R., Kanonykina A.Yu., Bogdanov L.A., Shishkova D.K., Kudryavtseva Yu.A. SELECTION OF POLYMER FOR STENT-GRAFT COATING IN TERMS OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY AND BIODEGRADATION CHARACTERISTICS. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2024;13(4):77-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2024-13-4-77-89