Preview

Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Advanced search

OPTIONS FOR REVASCULARIZATION OUTCOMES OPTIMIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH POLYVASCULAR DISEASE

https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2013-3-26-35

Abstract

Purpose. To perform a comparative assessment of diagnostic tools and strategies of myocardial revascularization in patients with and without polyvascular disease (PolyVD) based on the findings of perioperative analysis.

Materials and methods. The medical records of 2 828 patients, aged 32–84, consecutively admitted to the clinic of the Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases between January, 2006, and July, 2010, for coronary artery bypass surgery, were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 included 448 (15,48 %) PolyVD patients with clinically manifested or angiographically confirmed obliterating (≥ 60 %) non-cardiac artery lesions. Group 2 (the control group) included 1691(59,79 %) patients without any clinical symptoms of non-coronary atherosclerosis. The incidence rate, structure and causes of in-hospital mortality and type I neurological disorders (i.e. strokes and transient ischemic attacks) were assessed in both groups.

Results. The incidence rate of significant non-cardiac occlusive stenotic lesions in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), who had to undergo CABG, was 15,84 %. Simultaneous revascularization of coronary and non-coronary arteries was performed in 2,46 % of patients with CAD and PolyVD and multi-stage surgical procedures were chosen in other cases.

Conclusions. The outcomes of CAD surgical treatment were improved in this group of patients due to the implementation of a multidisciplinary team approach, which ensured a proper diagnosis of polyvascular disease.

About the Authors

S. V. Ivanov
Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo
Russian Federation


A. N. Sumin
Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo
Russian Federation


Y. V. Kazachek
Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo
Russian Federation


D. E. Philipiev
Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo
Russian Federation


S. M. Gusev
Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo
Russian Federation


E. S. Malyshenko
Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo
Russian Federation


L. S. Barbarash
Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kemerovo
Russian Federation


References

1. Авалиани В. М . Особенности аортокоронарного шунтирования у больных системным атеросклерозом. Архангельск: Изд-во СГМУ, 2007. 224 с.

2. Авалиани В. М., Чернов И. И., Шонбин А. Н. Коронарная хирургия при мультифокальном атеросклерозе: Руководство для врачей. М.: Универсум Паблишинг, 2005. 384 с.

3. Базылев В. В., Черногривов А. Е., Воеводин А. Б. Симультанные вмешательства на сонных и коронарных артериях – чем обусловлен риск? // Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2012. Т. 18, № 1. С. 106–115.

4. Бокерия Л. А., Гудкова Р. Г. Сердечно-сосудистая хирургия-2010. Болезни и врожденные аномалии системы кровообращения. М.: НЦССХ им. А. Н. Бакулева РАМН, 2011. 192 с.

5. Госпитальная летальность при хирургической реваскуляризации миокарда у больных с сочетанным поражением нескольких артериальных бассейнов / С. В. Иванов [и др.] // Роль сосудистой хирургии в снижении смертности в России: матер. 21-й (XXV) Международной конференции Российского общества ангиологов и сосудистых хирургов. Самара, 2009. № 2. С. 157–158.

6. Константинов Б. А., Белов Ю. В. Клинико-функциональная классификация сочетанных окклюзирующих поражений артериальной системы // Хирургия. 1995. № 5. С. 50–53.

7. Коронарная реваскуляризация. Рекомендации Европейского общества кардиологов 2010 года: пер. с англ. / под ред. В. И. Ганюкова [и др.]. Сибирская Ассоциация интервенционных кардиоангиологов, 2012. 96 с.

8. Национальные рекомендации по ведению пациентов с сосудистой артериальной патологией. Российский согласительный документ: в 3 ч. / под ред. А. В. Покровского. М., 2010–2012.

9. Показания к реваскуляризации миокарда (Российский согласительный документ) / Л. А. Бокерия [и др.]. М.: Изд-во НЦССХ им. А. Н. Бакулева РАМН, 2011. 162 с.

10. Послеоперационные неврологические нарушения I типа у пациентов после коронарного шунтирования / Л. С. Барбараш [и др.] // Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2011. № 5. С. 14–17.

11. Прогрессирующий мультифокальный атеросклероз: этиология, клинико-лучевая диагностика, современные аспекты лечения / Р. Ф. Акберов [и др.]. Казань: ИделПресс, 2008. 214 с.

12. Роль коронароангиографии в снижении числа кардиальных осложнений при сосудистых операциях / Л. С. Барбараш [и др.] // Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2012. № 4. С. 33–41.

13. Сергеев А. В. Стойкие органические загрязнители и атеросклероз. Достаточно ли имеющихся фактов, чтобы сделать однозначные выводы? // Кардиология. 2010. № 4. С. 50–54.

14. Сопоставление двух стратегий снижения риска кардиальных осложнений при сосудистых операциях / А. Н. Сумин [и др.] // Бюллетень НЦССХ Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. 2011. № 6. С. 70–79.

15. Факторы, влияющие на результаты операций коронарного шунтирования в пожилом и старческом возрасте / А. Н. Сумин [и др.] // Кардиология. 2013. № 1. С. 56–64.

16. Хирургическое лечение мультифокального атеросклероза / А. М. Чернявский [и др.] // Бюллетень СО РАМН. 2006. № 2 (120). С. 126–131.

17. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery / A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines // JACC. 2004. Vol. 44. Р. 213–310.

18. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery / L. D. Hillis [et al.] // JACC. 2011. Vol. 58. Р. 1–90.

19. Biomarkers of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting / S. J. Kim [et al] // Stroke. 2011. Vol. 42. P. 734–739.

20. Elevated Rho-Kinase Activity as a Marker Indicating Atherosclerosis and Inflammation Burden in Polyvascular Disease Patients With Concomitant Coronary and Peripheral Arterial Disease / M. Dong [et al.] // Clin. Cardiol. 2013. Vol. 36. P. 347–351.

21. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study / В. Brunekreef [et al.] // Res. Rep. Health Eff. Inst. 2009 (139). Р. 5–71.

22. Guidelines for pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery The Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and endorsed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) // Eur. Heart J. 2009. Vol. 30. P. 2769–2812.

23. Impact of polyvascular disease on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary revascularization: An observation from the CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2 / Y. Morikami [et al.]; CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG registry cohort-2 investigators // Atherosclerosis. 2013. Vol. 228 (2). P. 426–431.

24. Lind L., Lind P. M. Can persistent organic pollutants and plastic-associated chemicals cause cardiovascular disease? // J. Intern. Med. 2012. 271 (6). Р. 537–553.

25. Mastin J. P. Environmental cardiovascular disease // Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2005. № 5. Р. 91–94.

26. Multistate utilization. Processes and outcomesof carotid endarterectomy / T. F. Kresowik [et al.] // J. Vasc. Surg. 2001. Vol. 33. P. 227–235.

27. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 13,524 patients from randomized trials / M. P. Sá [et al.] // Rev. Bras. Cir. Cardiovasc. 2012. Vol. 27 (4). P. 631–641.

28. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery / A. L. Shroyer [et al.] // N. Engl. J. Med. 2009. Vol. 361. P. 1827–1837.

29. Outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Impact of preoperative risk / M. Polomsky [et al.] // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2013. Vol. 145 (5). P. 1193–1198.

30. Risk factors for carotid artery disease in patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting / A. Drohomirecka [et al.] // Kardiol. Pol. 2010. Vol. 68 (7). P. 789–794.

31. The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Fourth EACT Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report / B. Bridgewater [et al.]. United Kingdom; Dendrite Clinical Systems Ltd, 2010. 240 p.

32. The Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain & Ireland. Six National Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report Demonstrating quality 2008 / B. Bridgewater [et al.]. Oxrdshire, 2009. 512 p.


Review

For citations:


Ivanov S.V., Sumin A.N., Kazachek Y.V., Philipiev D.E., Gusev S.M., Malyshenko E.S., Barbarash L.S. OPTIONS FOR REVASCULARIZATION OUTCOMES OPTIMIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH POLYVASCULAR DISEASE. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2013;(3):26-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2013-3-26-35

Views: 666


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2306-1278 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9537 (Online)