EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL SUBSTANTIATION OF IMPLANTATION EFFICACY IN THE AORTIC POSITION OF “TIARA” BIOPROSTHESIS WITH A STENT MADE OF NITINOL
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2013-4-17-21
Abstract
Results of mathematical modeling of behaviour when loading of a new aortic bioprosthesis TiAra mounted at single-loop stent of nitinol wire are shown. The first clinical experience of TiAra prosthesis implantation in the aortic position is demonstrated. The prosthesis is implanted by one-row suture in subcoronary supraannular position. The implantation was held in two patients aged 71 and 75 with good clinical outcome. According to the control echocardiography the peak transprosthesis gradients at rest were 9-15 mm Hg. According to the results of clinical trial the prosthesis can be recommended for introduction into clinical practice.
About the Authors
D. A. AstapovRussian Federation
I. Yu. Zhuravleva
Russian Federation
chief research associate of experimental and clinical cardiology department of FSBI RI for CICVD, SB RAMS, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, 6, Sosnoviy blvd., Kemerovo, 650002 Tel.: +7 (3842) 64-16-53
K. Yu. Klyshnikov
Russian Federation
N. A. Scheglova
Russian Federation
D. P. Demidov
Russian Federation
E. A. Ovcharenko
Russian Federation
S. I. Zheleznev
Russian Federation
References
1. Материаловедение / Б. Н. Арзамасов [и др.] М.: Машиностроение, 1986. 384 с.
2. Биопротезы клапанов сердца в России: опыт трех клиник / Л. С. Барбараш [и др.] // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2011. №2. С. 21–26.
3. ГОСТ Р 52379–2005. Надлежащая клиническая практика. Введ. 2006. 01. 01. М.: Стандартинформ. 39 с.
4. Отдаленные результаты протезирования аортального клапана бескаркасными биопротезами «Кемерово-АБ-Моно», «Кемерово-АБ-Композит» и «Кемерово-АБ-Нео» / А. М. Караськов [и др.] // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2011. № 4. С. 23–28.
5. Протезирование аортального клапана бескаркасным биопротезом «Кемерово-АБ-Нео»: непосредственные результаты / Д. А. Астапов [и др.] // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2012. № 1. С. 23–26.
6. Тактические и технические аспекты имплантации ксеноаортального бескаркасного биопротеза «Кемерово-АБ-Композит Neo» / А. М. Караськов [и др.] // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2007. № 3. С. 15–19.
7. Auricchio F., Taylor R. L. Shape-Memory Alloys: Modeling and Numerical Simulations of the Finite-Strain Superelastic Behavior. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 1996. Vol. 143. Р. 175–194.
8. Auricchio F., Taylor R. L., Lubliner J. Shape-Memory Alloys: Macromodeling and Numerical Simulations of the Superelastic Behavior. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 1997. Vol. 146. Р. 281.
9. Biological artificial valve dysfunction – single centre, observational echocardiocraphic study in patients operated on before age 65 years / M. Maciejewski [et al.] // Arch. Med. Sci. 2011. Vol. 7. P. 993–999.
10. Comparsion between transcatheter and surgical prosthetic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction / M. A. Clavel [et al.] // Circulation. 2010. Vol. 122. P. 1928–1936.
11. Effect of surgeon on transprosthetic gradients after aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis and its consequences: a follow-up study in 587 patients / А. Albert [et al.] // J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2007. Vol. 2. Р. 40. URL: http://www.cardiothoracicsurgery.org/content/2/1/40.
12. Expanding the eligibility for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the trans-subclavian retrograde approach using the III generation CoreValve ravalving system / S. Fraccaro [et al.] // JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2009. Vol. 2. P. 828–833.
13. García Páez J. M., Carrera A., Herrero E. J. Nfluence of the selection of the suture material on the mechanical behavior of a biomaterial to be employed in the construction of implants. Part 1: Calf pericardium // J. Biomater. Appl. 2001. Vol. 16 (1). Р. 47–67.
14. Gublins H., Reichenspurner H. Which patients benefit from stentless aortic valve replacement // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009. Vol. 88. P. 2061–2008.
15. Mid-term follow up of a novel bioprosthesis in aortic valve surgery / M. Doss [et al.] // J. Heart Valve Dis. 2012. Vol. 21. P. 753–757.
16. Kobayashi J. Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update // Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2011. Vol. 7. P. 345–351.
17. Lin S., Akula P., Gu L. Mechanical Performance of Bovine Pericardial Bioprosthetic Valves // J. Med. Devices. 2013. Vol. 7(3).
18. Performance of stentless versus stented aortic valve bioprosthesis in the elderly patient: a prospective randomized trial / M. Doss [et al.] // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2003. Vol. 23. P. 299–304.
19. Retrospective clinical analysis of stented vs. stentless porcine aortic valve replacement / M. Vrandecic [et al.] // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2000. Vol. 18. P. 46–53.
Review
For citations:
Astapov D.A., Zhuravleva I.Yu., Klyshnikov K.Yu., Scheglova N.A., Demidov D.P., Ovcharenko E.A., Zheleznev S.I. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL SUBSTANTIATION OF IMPLANTATION EFFICACY IN THE AORTIC POSITION OF “TIARA” BIOPROSTHESIS WITH A STENT MADE OF NITINOL. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2013;(4):17-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2013-4-17-21