Preview

Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Advanced search

Grace Risk Score 2.0 predicts acute coronary syndrome outcomes: what marker of myocardial injury should we use?

https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2019-8-4-37-45

Abstract

Aim. To compare the effectiveness of various markers of myocardial injury (creatine phosphokinase MB-fraction (CK-MB), cardiac troponin I, measured by standard and high sensitivity methods (cTnI and hs-TnI), and heart-type fatty acids binding protein (H-FABP)) in predicting the ACS course using the GRACE 2.0 score.

Methods. 183 patients with a verified diagnosis of ACS were included in the study. The levels of CK-MB, cTnl, hs-Tnl and H-FABP were measured at admission. Qualitative assessment of H-FABP was performed by immunochromatographic express-tests “CARD-INFO” and “CardioFABP”. Risk assessment of death in the in-hospital period and within the 12-months follow-up period, as well as death and/or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) within the 12-months follow-up was estimated using the GRACE 2.0 score with alternate inclusion of the various cardiomarkers. The effectiveness of the resultant prognostic scales was evaluated using the ROC-analysis and comparison of the areas under the curve (AUC).

Results. 114 patients (62.3%) were diagnosed with AMI and 69 (37.7%) with unstable angina. 10 patients (5.5%) died during the indexed hospitalization. Four patients died within the follow-up and 8 patients (4.4%) had Ami. 94 patients (51.3%) had elevated hs-Tnl levels at admission, 90 patients (49.2%) - cTnl, 45 patients (24.6%) - CK-MB. H-FABP levels were elevated in 70 (38.3%). The express-test “CARD-INFO” was positive in 86 patients (47.0%), the “CardioFABP” - in 125 (68.3%). There were no significant differences found between the stratification of ACS patients by the GRACE 2.0 score into high and non-high risk groups in terms of complications (p<0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences found between the AUC values of the cardiomarkers in terms of developing the endpoints using the GRACE 2.0 score (p<0.05).

Conclusion. The introduction of H-FABP in the GRACE 2.0 scale is non-inferior to traditional markers of myocardial damage and may be used to stratify risk in patients with ACS.

About the Authors

V. A. Kokorin
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Kokorin Valentin A. - PhD, Associate Professor at the Department of the Hospital Therapy #1.

Ostrovityanova St., 1, Moscow, 117997


Competing Interests: not


M. N. Arefiev
Municipal Clinical Hospital N°15 named after O.M. Filatov
Russian Federation

Arefiev Mikhail N. - MD, Head of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care #9, Municipal Clinical Hospital #15 named after O.M. Filatov.

Veshnyakovskaya St., 23, Moscow, 111539


Competing Interests: not


I. G. Gordeev
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Gordeev Ivan G. - PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of the Hospital Therapy #1.

Ostrovityanova St., 1, Moscow, 117997


Competing Interests: not


References

1. Data on mortality by the causes of death in Russian Federation during the period January-December 2018. Federal service of statistics. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/2018/demo/t3_3.xls (In Russian.)

2. Fox KA, Dabbous OH, Goldberg RJ, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Van de Werf F, Avezum A, Goodman SG, Flather MD, Anderson FA Jr, Granger CB. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). BMJ. 2006; 333: 1091. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38985.646481.55.

3. Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, Huang W, Carruthers K, Simon T, Coste P, Monsegu J, Gabriel Steg P, Danchin N, Anderson F. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk? Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score. BMJ. 2014; 4 (2): e004425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004425.

4. Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Cannon CP, Van De Werf F, Avezum A, Goodman SG, Flather MD, Fox KA. Predictors of Hospital Mortality in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163(19): 2345-2353. doi:10.1001/archinte.163.19.2345.

5. Glatz JF, Renneberg R. Added value of H-FABP as a plasma biomarker for the early evaluation of suspected acute coronary syndrome. Clinical Lipidology. 2014; 9(2): 205-220. doi: 10.2217/clp.13.87.

6. Vupputuri A, Sekhar S, Krishnan S, Venugopal K, Natarajan KU. Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) as an early diagnostic biomarker in patients with acute chest pain. Indian Heart J. 2015; 67(6): 538-542. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2015.06.035.

7. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C, Cervellin G. Critical review and meta-analysis on the combination of heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) and troponin for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Clin Biochem. 2013; 46(1-2): 2630. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.10.016.

8. Xu LQ, Yang YM, Tong H, Xu CF. Early diagnostic performance of heart-type fatty acid binding protein in suspected acute myocardial infarction: evidence from a meta-analysis of contemporary studies. Heart Lung Circ. 2018; 27(4): 503-512. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.03.165.

9. Martynov AI, Spassky AA, Arutyunov GP, Veliev SN, Voevoda MI, Gafarov VV, Gerasimov SP, Kokorin VA, Karpov RS, Markov VA, Mikhailov AA, Nikolaev KYu, Petrova MM, Ragino YuI, Shtegman OA, Shoulman VA, Yarokhno NN. Early fast diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. National guidelines. Therapy. 2015; 3: 13-26 (In Russian.)

10. O'Donoghue M, de Lemos Ja, Morrow DA, Murphy SA, Buros JL, Cannon CP, Sabatine MS. Prognostic utility of heart-type fatty acid binding protein in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2006; 114: 550-557. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.641936.

11. Onda T, Inoue K, Suwa S, Nishizaki Y, Kasai T, Kimura Y, Fukuda K, Okai I, Fujiwara Y, Matsuoka J, Sumiyoshi M, Daida H. Reevaluation of cardiac risk scores and multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death in the drug-eluting stent era. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 219: 180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.014.

12. Body R, Burrows G, Carley S, Lewis PS. The Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule: validation with a new automated assay for heart-type fatty acid binding protein. Emerg Med J. 2015; 32(10): 769-774. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204235.

13. Jones JD, Chew PG, Dobson R, Wootton A, Ashrafi R, Khand A. The prognostic value of heart type fatty acid binding protein in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2017; 13(3): 189-198. doi: 10.2174/1573403X13666170116121451.

14. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD. Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33: 2551-2567. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184.

15. Onda T, Inoue K, Suwa S, Nishizaki Y, Kasai T, Kimura Y, Fukuda K, Okai I, Fujiwara Y, Matsuoka J, Sumiyoshi M, Daida H. Reevaluation of cardiac risk scores and multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death in the drug-eluting stent era. International Journal of Cardiology. 2016; 219: 180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.014.


Review

For citations:


Kokorin V.A., Arefiev M.N., Gordeev I.G. Grace Risk Score 2.0 predicts acute coronary syndrome outcomes: what marker of myocardial injury should we use? Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2019;8(4):37-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2019-8-4-37-45

Views: 2925


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2306-1278 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9537 (Online)