Cardiogenic shock: an update
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2019-8-4-127-137
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock is a critical condition characterized by rapid development of multiple organ dysfunction in the absence of intensive care. The article describes Abstract modern concepts about pathophysiology and approaches to treat intensive care. The concept of phased therapy as well as methods of mechanical circulatory support are discussed. The working algorithm for choosing the optimal method was proposed.
About the Authors
E. V. Grigoriev
Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases; Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Kemerovo State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Входит в редакционную коллегию журнала
Russian Federation
Grigoriev Evgeny V. - PhD, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Deputy Director for Scientific and Medical Issues RICICD; Chairman of the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Traumatology and Orthopedics KSMU.
6, Sosnoviy Blvd, Kemerovo, 650002; 22a, Voroshilova St., Kemerovo, 650029
Competing Interests: Входит в редакционную коллегию журнала
D. L. Shukevich
Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases; Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Kemerovo State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Входит в редакционную коллегию журнала
Russian Federation
Shukevich Dmitry L. - PhD, Head of the Laboratory of Critical Conditions RICICD; Professor at the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Traumatology and Orthopedics KSMU.
6, Sosnoviy Blvd, Kemerovo, 650002; 22a, Voroshilova St., Kemerovo, 650029
Competing Interests: Входит в редакционную коллегию журнала
R. A. Kornelyuk
Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: not
Russian Federation
Kornelyuk Roman A. - laboratory assistant at the Laboratory of Critical Conditions.
6, Sosnoviy Blvd, Kemerovo, 650002
Competing Interests: not
V. I. Ganyukov
Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: not
Russian Federation
Ganyukov Vladimir I. - PhD, Head of the Laboratory of Interventional Diagnostic and Treatment Methods.
6, Sosnoviy Blvd, Kemerovo, 650002
Competing Interests: not
N. A. Kochergin
Federal State Budgetary Institution Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: not
Russian Federation
Kochergin Nikita A. - PhD, researcher at the Laboratory for Interventional Diagnostic and Treatment Methods.
6, Sosnoviy Blvd, Kemerovo, 650002
Competing Interests: not
References
1. Hochman J.S., Sleeper L.A., Webb J.G., Sanborn T.A., White H.D., Talley J.D. et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:625-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410901
2. Thiele H., Zeymer U., Neumann F.-J., e Ferenc M., Olbrich H.G., Hausleiter J.,e t al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1287-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208410.
3. Ponikowski P., Voors A.A., Anker S.D., Bueno H., Cleland J.G.F., Coats A.J.S. et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2016; 37:2129-22. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128.
4. Baran D.A., Grines C.L., Bailey S., Burkhoff D., Hall S.A., Henry T.D. et al. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 94: 29-37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28329.
5. Sean van Diepen, Holger Thiele. (2019) An overview of international cardiogenic shock guidelines and application in clinical practice. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2019; 25:4, 365-370. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000624.
6. Jones T.L., Nakamura K., McCabe J.M. Cardiogenic shock: evolving definitions and future directions in management. Open Heart 2019; 6: e000960. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000960
7. Hochman J.S. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: expanding the paradigm. Circulation. 2003; 107:2998-3002. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000075927.67673.F2.
8. Hoste E. A., Maitland K., Brudney C. S., Mehta R., Vincent J.-L., Yates D., Kellum J.A., Mythen M.G., Shaw A.D. for the ADQI XII Investigators Group. Four phases of intravenous fluid therapy: a conceptual model. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014; 113 (5): 740-747 (2014). doi:10.1093/bja/aeu300
9. Hajjar L.A., Teboul J.-L.. Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock: State of the Art. Critical Care (2019) 23:76. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2368-y.
10. Price S., Platz E., Cullen L., Tavazzi G., Christ M., Cowie M.R. et al. Expert consensus document: echocardiography and lung ultrasonography for the assessment and management of acute heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017; 14:427-40. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.56.
11. Jozwiak M., Monnet X., Teboul J.L. Less or more hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018; 24:309-15. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000516.
12. McLean A.S. Echocardiography in shock management. Critical Care201620:275. doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1401-7
13. Toscani L., Aya H.D., Antonakaki D., Bastoni D., Watson X., Arulkumaran N., Rhodes A., Cecconi M. What is the impact of the fluid challenge technique on diagnosis of fluid responsiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017; 21:207. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1796-9
14. Levy B., Perez P., Perny J., Thivilier C., Gerard A. Comparison of norepinephrine-dobutamine to epinephrine for hemodynamics, lactate metabolism, and organ function variables in cardiogenic shock. A prospective, randomized pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2011 ;450-455(48):39. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ffe0eb.
15. Tarvasmaki T., Lassus J., Varpula M., Sionis A., Sund R. , K0ber L. et al. Current real-life use of vasopressors and inotropes in cardiogenic shock—adrenaline use is associated with excess organ injury and mortality. Crit Care. 2016; 20:208. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-13 87-1.
16. Leopold V., Gayat E., Pirracchio R., Spinar J., Parenica J. , Tarvasmaki T. et al. Epinephrine and short-term survival in cardiogenic shock: an individual data meta-analysis of 2583 patients. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44:847-56. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5222-9.
17. Herpain A., Bouchez S., Girardis M., Guarracino F. , Knotzer J., Levy B., Liebregts T., Pollesello P., Ricksten S. E., Riha H., Rudiger A., Sangalli F. Use of Levosimendan in Intensive Care Unit Settings. An Opinion Paper. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. 2019; 73(1): 3-14. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000636
18. Vallabhajosyula S., Dunlay S.M., Prasad A., Kashani K. , Sakhuja A., Gersh B.J., Jaffe A.S., Holmes D.R., Barsness G. W. Acute Noncardiac Organ Failure in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock. Journal of the American College of Cardiology Apr 2019, 73 (14) 1781-1791; doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.053
19. Goldberg R.J., Makam R.C., Yarzebski J., McManus D.D., Lessard D., Gore J.M. Decade-long trends (2001-2011) in the incidence and hospital death rates associated with the inhospital development of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016; 9:117-125. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.n5.002359.
20. Hochman J.S., Sleeper L.A., Webb J.G., Dzavik .V, Buller C.E., Aylward P., Col J., White H.D.; SHOCK Investigators. Early revascularization and long term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2006; 295:2511-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2511
21. O’Gara P.T., Kushner F.G., Ascheim D.D., Casey D.E. Jr, Chung M.K., de Lemos J. et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2013; 127: e362-425. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742cf6.
22. Pancholy S.B., Palamaner Subash Shantha G., Romagnoli E., Kedev S., Bernat I., Rao S.V., Jolly S., Bertrand O.F., Patel T.M. Impact of access site choice on outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2015; 170:353-361. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.05.001
23. Seto A.H., Roberts J.S., Abu-Fadel M.S., Czak S.J., Latif F., Jain S.P., Raza J.A., Mangla A., Panagopoulos G., Patel P.M., Kern M.J., Lasic Z. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access: RAUST (Radial Artery access with Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8:283291. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.036
24. Levine G.N., Bates E.R., Blankenship J.C., Bailey S.R., Bittl J.A., Cercek B., et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/ AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2016; 133:11351147. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000336
25. Ledwoch J., Fuernau G., Desch S., Eitel I., Jung C., de Waha S., Poss J., Schneider S., Schuler G., Werdan K., Zeymer U., Theile H.T. Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Heart. 2017 Aug;103(15):1177-1184. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310403
26. Park J.S., Cha K.S., Lee D.S., Shin D., Lee H.W., Oh J. H., Kim J.S., Choi J.H., Park Y.H., Lee H.C., Kim J.H., Chun K. J., Hong T.J., Jeong M.H., Ahn Y., Chae S.C., Kim Y.J.; Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Investigators. Culprit or multivessel revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Heart. 2015; 101:1225-1232. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307220
27. Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Steg P.G., James S.K., Atar D., Badano L. P., Blomstrom-Lundqvist C., Borger M.A., Di Mario C., Dickstein K., Ducrocq G., Fernandez-Aviles F., Gershlick A.H., Giannuzzi P., Halvorsen S., Huber K., Juni P., Kastrati A., Knuuti J., Lenzen M.J., Mahaffey K.W., Valgimigli M., Widimsky P., Zahger D.. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33:2569-619
28. Holger Thiele, Ibrahim Akin, Marcus Sandri, Suzanne de Waha-Thiele, Roza Meyer-Saraei, Georg Fuernau, Ingo Eitel, Peter Nordbeck, Tobias Geisler, Ulf Landmesser, Carsten Skurk, Andreas Fach, et al., CULPRIT-SHOCK Investigators. One-Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med 2018; 379:1699-1710 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808788
29. Mehta R.H., Lopes R.D., Ballotta A., Frigiola A., Sketch M.H. Jr, Bossone E., Bates E.R. Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery for cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease? Am Heart J 2010; 159:141-7; doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.035.
30. Aso S., Matsui H., Fushimi K., Yasunaga H. The effect of intraaortic balloon pumping under venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on mortality of cardiogenic patients: an analysis using a nationwide inpatient database. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1974-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001828
31. Bugaenko D.V., Fominyh M.V, Eremenko A.A. Sovremennye ustrojstva podderzhki levogo zheludochka, ustanavlivaemye posredstvom chreskozhnogo dostupa. Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya hirurgiya. 2018; 11 (3): 3 5 -40. ( In Russian)
32. Kar B., Gregoric I.D., Basra S.S., Idelchrk G.M., Loyalka P. The percutaneous ventricular assist device in severe refractory cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57:68896. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.613.
33. Ouweneel D.M., Eriksen E., Sjauw K.D., van Dongen I. M., Hirsch A., Packer E.J. et al. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support versus intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69:278-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.022.
34. Ouweneel D.M., Schotborogh J.V, Limpens J., Sjauw K.D., Engstrom A.E., Lagrand W.K. et al. Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016; 42:1922-34. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4536-8.
35. Vereshchagin I.E., Ganyukov VI., Shukevich D.L., Kornelyuk R.A. Percutaneous coronary intervention in a patient with cardiogenic shock in the conditions of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Endovasculyarnaya Khirurgiya (Russian Journal of Endovascular Surgery). 2017; 4 (3): 22531. doi: 10.24183/2409-4080-2017-4-3-225-231 (In Russian)
36. Rihal C.S., Naidu S.S., Givertz M.M., Szeto W.Y., Burke J.A., Kapur N.K., Kern M., Garratt K.N., Goldstein J. A., Dimas V, Tu T.; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI); Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA); Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS); American Heart Association (AHA), and American College of Cardiology (ACC). 2015 SCAI/ACC/HF S A/ST S Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care: Endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 19;65(19):e7-e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.036.
37. R.A. Kornelyuk, I.E. Vereshchagin, D.L. Shukevich, V.I. Ganyukov. Mechanical circulatory support in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2018; 7 (4S): 54-65. DOI: 10.17802/2306-1278-2018-7-4S-54-65 (In Russian)
Supplementary files
|
|
1. Графическое резюме | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(354KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
Review
For citations:
Grigoriev E.V., Shukevich D.L., Kornelyuk R.A., Ganyukov V.I., Kochergin N.A. Cardiogenic shock: an update. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2019;8(4):127-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2019-8-4-127-137
Views:
3241
