MANAGEMENT CHOICE FOR AIRWAY MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH HIGH RISK OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2014-4-24-28
Abstract
The purpose. We compared second generation LMA I-gel (single-use supraglottic airway device without an inflatable cuff) with tracheal tube in anesthetized and paralyzed patients with high risk of cardiovascular complications.
Materials and methods. Ninety-six female patients (ASA III, 52–76 years) undergoing elective breast surgery were studied. Patients were allocated into two groups: airway management in one group was with a tracheal tube (n=48), and in the other, with an I-gel (n=48). We compared the hemodynamic changes (BP, HR, CI, TPR) before and after the airway management.
Conclusion. We suggest that the I-gel can be used as a reasonable alternative to tracheal tube intubation during the general anesthesia in the patients with high risk of the cardiovascular complications.
About the Authors
O. A. Tarabrin
Odessa National Medical University, Odessa
Ukraine
Ukraine
Dr. Med. Sci., Prof.
head of anesthesiology, intensive care and postgraduate training department
Correspondence address:
O. A. Tarabrin, 2, Valikhovskiy lane, 65082, Odessa. Tel.: 38 (048) 7031546
A. L. Bobyr
Odessa National Medical University, Odessa
Ukraine
Ukraine
References
1. Место и роль ларингеальной маски в современной анестезиологии / А. Л. Бобырь [и др.] // Досягнення біології та медицини. 2012. № 1 (19). С. 29–31.
2. A new single use supraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study of the i-gel / B. Richez [et al.] // Anesth. Analg. 2008. Vol. 106. P. 1137–1139.
3. A randomised crossover trial comparing the i-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway / C. Janakiraman [et al.] // Anaesthesia. 2009. Vol. 64. Р. 674–678.
4. ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery – executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) / K. A. Eagle [et al.] // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002. Vol. 39. P. 542–653.
5. Bamgbade O., Macnab W., Khalaf W. Evaluation of the i-gel airway in 300 patients // Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2008. Vol. 25 (10). P. 865–866.
6. Brain A. The development of the laryngeal mask: A brief history of the invention, early clinical studies and experimental work from which the laryngeal mask evolved // Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 1991. Vol. 4. P. 5–17.
7. Brain A. The laryngeal mask: A new concept in airway management // Br. J. Anaesth. 1983. Vol. 55. P. 801–805.
8. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery / T. H. Lee [et al.] // Circulation. 1999. Vol. 100. P. 1043–1049.
9. Drolet P. Supraglottic airways and pulmonary aspiration: the role of the drain tube // Can. J. Anaesth. 2009. Vol. 56. P. 715–720.
10. Perioperative cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a review of the magnitude of the problem, the pathophysiology of the events and methods to estimate and communicate risk / P. J. Devereaux [et al.] // CMAJ. 2005. Vol. 173 (6). P. 627–634.
11. Perioperative cardiovascular mortality in noncardiac surgery: validation of the Lee cardiac risk index / E. Boersma [et al.] // Am. J. Med. 2005. Vol. 118. P. 1134–1141.
Review
For citations:
Tarabrin O.A., Bobyr A.L. MANAGEMENT CHOICE FOR AIRWAY MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH HIGH RISK OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2014;(4):24-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2014-4-24-28
Views:
612
