Preview

Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Advanced search

HETEROPHILE ANTIBODIES – A RARE BUT SIGNIFICANT CAUSE OF FALSE POSITIVE CARDIAC TROPONIN LEVELS

https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2024-13-4-104-115

Abstract

Highlights

Practitioners regularly encounter unexplained (false-positive) causes and mechanisms of increased concentrations of cardiac troponins. One of the most significant and common causes of false increases in cardiac troponin levels are heterophile antibodies. There are no articles in domestic and foreign databases that systematize in detail information about the prevalence, mechanisms of increase and ways to combat this cause of false-positive increase in cardiac troponin concentration, which was the purpose of this manuscript.

 

Annotation

According to traditional concepts, cardiospecific troponins (cTnT and cTnI) are the most important laboratory biomarkers with high diagnostic value in myocardial infarction (MI). The development of new generations of methods for determining cTnT and cTnI, also called high- and ultra-sensitive methods, has expanded the diagnostic capabilities of cardiac troponins in relation to other diseases in which myocardial tissue is involved in the pathological process, thereby carrying additional prognostic value. Given the wide scope for use of cTnT and cTnI, which is not limited to the diagnosis of MI, there is an urgent need to carefully identify all factors that can in any significant way affect or distort the result of laboratory testing of blood serum for cTnT and cTnI. Among all known factors affecting the concentration of cTnT and cTnI, heterophile antibodies are the most significant in terms of the degree of change (increase) in serum levels. In this review, we will consider the main causes of the formation of heterophile antibodies, the mechanisms of their influence on the concentration of cTnT and cTnI, as well as methods for detecting and combating heterophile antibodies.

About the Authors

Alexey M. Chaulin
State Budgetary Healthcare Institution ‘Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary named after V.P. Polyakov”; Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Samara State Medical University”
Russian Federation

Clinical Laboratory Specialist at the Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution “Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary named after V.P. Polyakov”, Samara, Russian Federation; Postgraduate Student, Assistant at the Department of Histology and Embryology, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Samara State Medical University” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Samara, Russian Federation



Polina D. Duplyakova
State Budgetary Healthcare Institution ‘Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary named after V.P. Polyakov”; Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Samara State Medical University”
Russian Federation

Cardiologist at the State Budgetary Healthcare Institution “Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary named after V.P. Polyakov”, Samara, Russian Federation; Postgraduate Student at the Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Samara State Medical University” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Samara, Russian Federation



Dmitry V. Duplyakov
State Budgetary Healthcare Institution ‘Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary named after V.P. Polyakov”; Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Samara State Medical University”
Russian Federation

Professor, Deputy Chief Physician, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution “Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary named after V.P. Polyakov”, Samara, Russian Federation; Director of the Research Institute of Cardiology, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Samara State Medical University” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Samara, Russian Federation



References

1. Thygesen K., Alpert J.S., Jaffe A.S., Chaitman B.R., Bax J.J., Morrow D.A., White H.D.; ESC Scientific Document Group.Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). European Heart Journal. 2019;40(3):237–69. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462

2. Bodor G.S., Survant L., Voss E.M., Smith S., Porterfield D., Apple F.S. Cardiac troponin T composition in normal and regenerating human skeletal muscle. Clin Chem. 1997;43(3):476–484. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/43.3.476

3. Wens S.C.A., Schaaf G.J., Michels M., Kruijshaar M.E., van Gestel T.J., In 't Groen S., Pijnenburg J., Dekkers D.H., Demmers J.A., Verdijk L.B., Brusse E., van Schaik R.H., van der Ploeg A.T., van Doorn P.A., Pijnappel W.W. Elevated plasma cardiac troponin T levels caused by skeletal muscle damage in Pompe disease. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016;9(1):6-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.115.001322.

4. Rusakov D.Y., Vologdina N.N., Tulayeva O.N. The development of striated cardiac muscle tissue in the walls of the caval and pulmonary veins. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2015;4(3):105-105. doi:10.18499/2225-7357-2015-4-3-105-105. (In Russian)

5. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine: Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio-Markers. Analytical Characteristics of Commercial Cardiac Troponin I and T Assays Declared by the Manufacturer. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Available at: http://www.ifcc.org/media/477275/ifccenewsmay2018.pdf. (accessed 9.10.2024)

6. Garcia-Osuna A., Gaze D., Grau-Agramunt M., Morris T., Telha C., Bartolome A., Bishop J.J., Monsalve L., Livingston R., Estis J., Nolan N., Sandlund J., Ordonez-Llanos J. Ultrasensitive quantification of cardiac troponin I by a Single Molecule Counting method: analytical validation and biological features. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;486:224‐231. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.015

7. Чаулин А.М., Дупляков Д.В. Биомаркеры острого инфаркта миокарда: диагностическая и прогностическая ценность. Часть 1 (обзор литературы). Клиническая практика. 2020;11(3): 75-84. doi: 10.17816/clinpract34284). [Chaulin AM, Duplyakov DV. Biomarkers of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Diagnostic and Prognostic Value. Part 1. Journal of Clinical Practice. 2020;11(3):75–84. doi: 10.17816/clinpract34284 (In Russian)]

8. Pervan P., Svaguša T., Prkačin I., Savuk A., Bakos M,. Perkov S. Urine high sensitive Troponin I measuring in patients with hypertension. Signa Vitae - A Journal In Intensive Care And Emergency Medicine. 2017;13(Suppl 3):62–4. doi: 10.22514/SV133.062017.13

9. Lazzarino A.I., Hamer M., Gaze D., Collinson P., Steptoe A. The association between cortisol response to mental stress and high sensitivity cardiac troponin T plasma concentration in healthy adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62 (18): 1694-1701. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.070

10. Niculescu F, Rus HG, Maican A, Petcovici M. Anticorpii heterofili [Heterophile antibodies]. Rev Ig Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol Pneumoftiziol Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol. 1989;34(2):107-112.

11. Levinson S.S., Miller J.J. Towards a better understanding of heterophile (and the like) antibody interference with modern immunoassays. Clin Chim Acta. 2002;325(1-2):1-15. doi:10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00275-9

12. Santos L.G., Carvalho R.R., Montegro Sa.F., Soares F., Pernencar S., Castro R., Morais J. Circulating heterophile antibodies causing cardiac troponin elevation: an unusual differential diagnosis of myocardial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol Case Rep 2020;2: 456–460. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.01.011.

13. Morton A. When lab tests lie … heterophile antibodies. Aust Fam Physician. 2014;43(6):391-393.

14. Bolstad N., Warren D.J., Nustad K. Heterophilic antibody interference in immunometric assays. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;27(5):647-661. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2013.05.011

15. Fitzmaurice T.F., Brown C., Rifai N., Wu A.H., Yeo K.T. False increase of cardiac troponin I with heterophilic antibodies. Clin Chem. 1998;44(10):2212-2214.

16. Kazmierczak S.C., Catrou P.G., Briley K.P. Transient nature of interference effects from heterophile antibodies: examples of interference with cardiac marker measurements. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000;38(1):33-39. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2000.006

17. Yeo K.T., Storm C.A., Li Y., Jayne J.E., Brough T., Quinn-Hall K.S., Fitzmaurice T.F. Performance of the enhanced Abbott AxSYM cardiac troponin I reagent in patients with heterophilic antibodies. Clin Chim Acta. 2000;292(1-2):13-23. doi:10.1016/s0009-8981(99)00260-0

18. Uettwiller-Geiger D., Wu A.H., Apple F.S., Jevans A.W., Venge P., Olson M.D., Darte C., Woodrum D.L., Roberts S., Chan S. Multicenter evaluation of an automated assay for troponin I. Clin Chem. 2002;48(6 Pt 1):869-876.

19. White G.H., Tideman P.A. Heterophilic antibody interference with CARDIAC T Quantitative Rapid Assay. Clin Chem. 2002;48(1):201-203.

20. Cassin M., Cappelletti P., Rubin D., Zaninotto M., Macor F., Nicolosi G.L. Due casi di incremento spurio di troponina I in pazienti con anticorpi eterofili [Two cases of false troponin I increase in patients with heterophile antibodies]. Ital Heart J Suppl. 2002;3(2):235-238.

21. Knoblock R.J., Lehman C.M., Smith R.A., Apple F.S., Roberts W.L. False-positive AxSYM cardiac troponin I results in a 53-year-old woman. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126(5):606-609. doi:10.1043/0003-9985(2002)126<0606:FPACTI

22. Kim W.J., Laterza O.F., Hock K.G., Pierson-Perry J.F., Kaminski D.M., Mesguich M., Braconnier F., Zimmermann R., Zaninotto M., Plebani M., Hanna A., Cembrowski G.S., Scott M.G. Performance of a revised cardiac troponin method that minimizes interferences from heterophilic antibodies. Clin Chem. 2002;48(7):1028-1034.

23. Zaninotto M., Mion M., Altinier S., Forni M., Plebani M. Quality specifications for biochemical markers of myocardial injury. Clin Chim Acta. 2004;346(1):65-72. doi:10.1016/j.cccn.2004.02.035

24. Fleming S.M., O'Byrne L., Finn J., Grimes H., Daly K.M. False-positive cardiac troponin I in a routine clinical population. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89(10):1212-1215. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02309-3

25. García-Mancebo M.L., Agulló-Ortuño M.T., Gimeno J.R., Navarro-Martínez M.D., Ruíz-Gómez J., Noguera-Velasco J.A. Heterophile antibodies produce spuriously elevated concentrations of cardiac Troponin I in patients with Legionella pneumophila. Clin Biochem. 2005;38(6):584-587. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.01.019

26. Bionda C., Rousson R., Collin-Chavagnac D., Manchon M., Chikh K., Charrié A. Unnecessary coronary angiography due to false positive troponin I results in a 51-year-old man. Clin Chim Acta. 2007;378(1-2):225-226. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2006.10.007

27. Zhu Y., Jenkins M.M., Brass D.A., Ravago P.G., Horne B.D., Dean S.B., Drayton N. Heterophilic antibody interference in an ultra-sensitive 3-site sandwich troponin I immunoassay. Clin Chim Acta. 2008;395(1-2):181-182. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2008.04.027

28. Ghali S., Lewis K., Kazan V., Altorok N., Taji J., Taleb M., Lanka K., Assaly R. Fluctuation of spuriously elevated troponin I: a case report. Case Rep Crit Care. 2012;2012:585879. doi:10.1155/2012/585879

29. Nørlund H., Bovin A. [False positive troponin I due to heterophile antibodies]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2017;179(49):V05170412.

30. Nguyen J., Thachil R., Vyas N., Marino T. Falsely elevated troponin: rare occurrence or future problem. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2016;6(6):32952. doi:10.3402/jchimp.v6.32952

31. Manjunath L., Yeluru A., Rodriguez F. 27-Year-Old Man with a Positive Troponin: A Case Report. Cardiol Ther. 2018;7(2):197-204. doi:10.1007/s40119-018-0120-3

32. Baroni S., Troiani E., Santonocito C., Moretti G., De Luca C., Antenucci M., Urbani A. A false positive case of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin in a patient with acute chest pain: Analytical study of the interference. Clin Biochem. 2019;66:103-105. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.02.002

33. Kavsak P.A., Ainsworth C. A heterophile antibody affecting a contemporary but not a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assay. Clin Biochem. 2019;71:72-73. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.07.004

34. Lakusic N., Sopek Merkas I., Lucinger D., Mahovic D. Heterophile antibodies, false-positive troponin, and acute coronary syndrome: a case report indicating a pitfall in clinical practice. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021;5(2):ytab018. doi:10.1093/ehjcr/ytab018.

35. Santos L.G., Ribeiro Carvalho R., Montenegro Sá. F., Soares F., Pernencar S., Castro R., Morais J. Circulating Heterophile Antibodies Causing Cardiac Troponin Elevation: An Unusual Differential Diagnosis of Myocardial Disease. JACC: Case Reports 2020;3:456-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.01.011.

36. Herman D.S., Kavsak P.A., Greene D.N. Variability and Error in Cardiac Troponin Testing: An ACLPS Critical Review. Am J Clin Pathol. 2017 Oct 1;148(4):281-295. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqx066.


Review

For citations:


Chaulin A.M., Duplyakova P.D., Duplyakov D.V. HETEROPHILE ANTIBODIES – A RARE BUT SIGNIFICANT CAUSE OF FALSE POSITIVE CARDIAC TROPONIN LEVELS. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2024;13(4):104-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2024-13-4-104-115

Views: 232


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2306-1278 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9537 (Online)