RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON EXPERTS’ OPINION. STANDPOINT OF RUSSIAN PHYSICIANS
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2015-1-65-70
Abstract
The article presents the standpoint of Russian physicians (obtained by means of survey of 13 expert clinician cardiologists of a Russian clinic) on the recommendations ofAmericanAcademyof Family Physicians based on expert’s opinion. According to the results of the survey it is noted that a consensus was reached in 8 out of 12 recommendations, and upon one of the recommendations all Russian physicians participating in the survey disagreed. Thereby it is shown that the recommendations is only a basis for decision making and in each particular case a physician makes a decision based on the clinical features and the current situation. Moreover, our research testifies that perhaps in the Russian Federation it is also needed to use not just blind copying of even the most advanced recommendations and quite formal (but not formalized) discussion of these recommendations by specialists. It is also necessary to update the recommendations taking into account the new evidences (results of methodologically correct researches) as well as reasonability of participating in discussion and considering the opinions of representatives and scientific communities, practitioners, representatives of different medical organizations, governing bodies of the health care system and insurance companies.
About the Authors
I. V. Samorodskaya
National Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. L. Barbarash
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. N. Sumin
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. V. Kondrikova
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
For correspondence: Kondrikova Natalya Address: 6, Sosnoviy blvd., Kemerovo, 650002, Russian Federation Tel. 8 (3842) 64-31-53 E-mail: nkondrik@ya.ru
References
1. Patel M. R., Dehmer G. J., Hirshfeld J. W., Smith P. K., Spertus J. A., Masoudi F. A. et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/ AHA/ASNC. 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization. Circulation. 2009; 119: 1330–1352.
2. Patel M. R., Bailey S. R., Bonow R. O., Chambers C. E., Chan P. S., Dehmer G. J. et al. ACCF Proposed Method for Evaluating the Appropriateness of Cardiovascular Imaging. J. Am. Coll. Card. 2005; 46 (8): 1606–1613.
3. Leape L. L., Park R. E., Kahan J. P., Brook R. H. Group judgments of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition. Qual. Assur. Health Care. 1992; 4: 151–159.
4. Kahan J. P., Park R. E., Leape L. L. Variations by specialty in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures. Med. Care. 1996; 34: 512–523.
5. James P. A., Oparil S., Carter B. L., Cushman W. C., Dennison-Himmelfarb C., Handler J. et al. 2014 Evidence- Based Guideline for the Management of High Blood Pressure in AdultsReport From the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014; 311(5): 507–520.
6. Бритов А . Н., Быстрова М . М . Новые рекомендации объединенного национального комитета по предупреждению, диагностике и лечению артериальной гипертонии (США): от JNC VI к JNC VII. Кардиология. 2003; 11: 93–97. Britov A. N., Bystrova M. M. New Guidelines of the Joint National Committee (USA) on Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension. From JNC VI to JNC VII. Kardiologija. 2003; 11: 93–97. [In Russ].
7. Эрлих А . Д., Харченко М . С., Барбараш О . Л ., Кашталап В . В ., Зыков М . В ., Печерина Т. Б. и др. Степень приверженности к выполнению руководств по лечению острого коронарного синдрома в клинической практике российских стационаров и исходы в период госпитализации (данные регистра «Рекорд-2»). Кардиология. 2013; 1: 14–22. Erlikh A. D., Kharchenko M. S., Barbarash O. L., Kashtalap V. V., Zykov M. V., Pechyorina T. B. et al. Adherence to Guidelines on Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Russian Hospitals and Outcomes of Hospitalization (Data From the RECORD-2 Registry). Kardiologija. 2013. 2013; 1: 14–22. [In Russ].
8. Siwek J., Kenneth W. More Ways to Improve Health and Reduce Harm: Choosing Wisely Phase 3. Am Fam Physician. 2014; Mar 1; 89(5): 329.
9. Фроловичева И . С., Mозжухина Н. В ., Чомахидзе П. Ш., Полтавская М . Г ., Черноусов А . Ф., Сыркин А . Л . и др. Оценка риска развития сердечно-сосудистых осложнений при некардиологических вмешательствах: основные рекомендации и клинические наблюдения. Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2013; 3: 94–100. Frolovicheva I. S., Mozzhukhina N. V., Chomakhidze P. Sh., Poltavskaia M. G., Chernousov A. F., Syrkin A. L. et al. Evaluation of risk for cardiovascular complications of noncardiac interventions: general recommendations and clinical observations. Kardiologija i serdechno-sosudistaja hirurgija. 2013; 3: 94–100. [In Russ].
10. Сумин А . Н., Барбараш О . Л . Противоречия в тактике оценки и снижения риска кардиологических осложнений при некардиальных операциях: неинвазивные стресс- тесты. Сердце. 2011; 4: 199–206. Sumin A. N., Barbarash O. L. Protivorechija v taktike ocenki i snizhenija riska kardiologicheskih oslozhnenij pri nekardial’nyh operacijah: neinvazivnye stress-testy. Serdce. 2011; 4: 199–206. [In Russ].
11. Landesberg G., Mosseri M. Prophylactic Pre-Operative Coronary Revascularization. Is the Phoenix Awakening? JACC 2009; 54 (1): 997–998.
12. Landesberg G., Mosseri M. PRO: Preoperative Coronary Revascularization in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008; 106(3): 759–763.
13. Mokkink L. B., Terwee C. B., Patrick D. L., Alonso J., Stratford P. W., Knol D. L. et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patientreported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2010; 63: 737–745.
Review
For citations:
Samorodskaya I.V., Barbarash O.L., Sumin A.N., Kondrikova N.V. RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON EXPERTS’ OPINION. STANDPOINT OF RUSSIAN PHYSICIANS. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2015;(1):65-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2015-1-65-70
Views:
810
