КОНЦЕПЦИЯ ПЕРИОПЕРАЦИОННОГО КАРДИАЛЬНОГО РИСКА: ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ

Основные положения

• В обзоре впервые предложена интегративная концептуальная модель высокого периоперационного кардиального риска, объединяющая три ключевых блока: риск операции, уязвимость пациента и динамический контроль, что позволяет системно подойти к стратификации пациентов перед некардиальными операциями.
• Продемонстрирован критический разрыв между высокой прогностической точностью современных моделей машинного обучения (AUROC > 0,90) и отсутствием их клинической валидации в реальной практике, особенно в отечественной популяции, что определяет необходимость разработки национального калькулятора риска.
• Впервые в отечественной литературе детально проанализирована роль MINS (повреждения миокарда после некардиальных операций) как основного драйвера послеоперационной летальности (вклад 3,9% в общую летальность) и обоснован переход от реактивного к превентивному управлению периоперационным кардиальным риском на основе рутинного мониторинга высокочувствительных тропонинов и натрийуретических пептидов.

Резюме

Данный обзор посвящен современным подходам к оценке и управлению периоперационным кардиальным риском у пациентов, переносящих некардиальные хирургические вмешательства. Актуальность темы обусловлена высокой частотой серьезных неблагоприятных сердечно-сосудистых событий (MACE), являющихся ведущей причиной периоперационной летальности. В работе проанализирована эволюция парадигмы от вопроса «можно ли оперировать?» к стратегии «как улучшить исход?», что включает предоперационную оптимизацию, активный мониторинг и мультидисциплинарный подход.

На основе поиска литературы рассмотрены эпидемиология и ключевые факторы риска, детализированы классификации и определения осложнений (MACE, повреждение миокарда после некардиальных операций (MINS), интраоперационные критические инциденты). Особое внимание уделено роли биомаркеров (NT-proBNP/BNP для прогнозирования, высокочувствительный тропонин для диагностики MINS) и гемодинамического контроля в стратификации риска и раннем выявлении повреждения миокарда.

Проведен сравнительный анализ прогностических инструментов: от традиционных клинических шкал (индекс Lee, NSQIP) до современных моделей машинного обучения, демонстрирующих высокую точность. Отмечены проблемы валидации, клинической интерпретируемости и интеграции этих инструментов в рутинную практику. Обобщены современные рекомендации по минимизации риска, основанные на поэтапной персонализированной оценке, оптимизации состояния пациента и активном послеоперационном наблюдении.

Делается вывод о необходимости разработки интегративных, прозрачных и клинически применимых алгоритмов, сочетающих данные шкал, биомаркеров и динамического мониторинга для перехода от реактивного к превентивному управлению периоперационным кардиальным риском.

1. Smilowitz NR, Gupta N, Ramakrishna H, et al. Perioperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events associated with noncardiac surgery. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(2):181-187. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4792

2. Devereaux PJ, Chan MT, Alonso-Coello P, et al., Vascular Events In Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation Study I Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 2012;307(21):2295–304

3. Smilowitz NR, Gupta N, Guo Y, et al. Trends in cardiovascular risk factor and disease prevalence in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Heart. 2018;104 (14):1180-1186. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312391.

4. Writing Committee for the VISION Study Investigators; Devereaux PJ, Biccard BM, Sigamani A., et al. Association of postoperative high-sensitivity troponin levels with myocardial injury and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 2017;317(16):1642-1651. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.4360

5. Boghean, A., Guțu, C., & Firescu, D. (2025). Perioperative Risk: Short Review of Current Approach in Non Cardiac Surgery. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12010024.

6. Заболотских И.Б. Концепция периоперационного риска: обзор литературы. Вестник интенсивной терапии имени А.И. Салтанова. 2024;(4):40–57. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2024-4-40-57.

7. Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Long CD, et al. Preventable anaesthesia mishaps. A study of human factors. Anesthesiology 1978;49:399–406.

8. Bielka K., Kuchyn I., Frank M. et al. Critical incidents during anesthesia: prospective audit. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023; 23(1): 206. Published 2023 Jun 14. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02171-4

9. Gregory A, Stapelfeldt WH, Khanna AK, et al. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with adverse clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2021;132:1654–1665

10. Futier E, Lefrant JY, Guinot PG, et al.; INPRESS Study Group. Effect of Individualized vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1346-1357

11. Sessler DI, Bloomstone JA, Aronson S, et al; Perioperative Quality Initiative-3 workgroup. Perioperative quality initiativeтconsensus statement on intraoperative blood pressure, risk and outcomes for elective surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122:563–574

12. Wesselink EM, Kappen TH, Torn HM, et al. Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121:706–721

13. Abbott TEF, Rupert M, Pearse R, et al. A prospective international multicentre cohort study of intraoperative heart rate and systolic blood pressure and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: results of the VISION study. Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):1936-194

14. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9627): 1839-1847

15. Duncker DJ, Bache RJ. Regulation of coronary blood flow during exercise. Physiol Rev 2008; 88:1009–1086

16. Sobreira-Fernandes D, Teixeira L, Lemos TS, et al. Perioperative cardiac arrests – a subanalysis of the anesthesia-related cardiac arrests and associated mortality. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2018; 50: 78–90.

17. Fielding-Singh V, Willingham MD, Fischer MA, et al. A population-based analysis of intraoperative cardiac arrest in the United States. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2020; 130: 627–34

18. Dell-Kuster S, Gomes NV, Gawria L, et al. Prospective validation of classification of intraoperative adverse events (ClassIntra): international, multicentre cohort study. BMJ. 2020 Aug 25;370:m2917.

19. Saugel B, Sessler DI. Perioperative blood pressure management. Anesthesiology 2021; 134: 250e61

20. Liem VGB, Hoeks SE, Mol KHJM, et al. Postoperative hypotension after noncardiac surgery and the association with myocardial injury. Anesthesiology 2020; 133: 510e22

21. Maheshwari K, Ahuja S, Khanna AK, et al. Association between perioperative hypotension and delirium in postoperative critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort analysis. Anesth Analg 2020; 130:636–643.

22. Fayad AA, Yang HY, Ruddy TD, et al. Perioperative myocardial ischemia and isolated systolic hypertension in non-cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58(5):428–35.

23. Haskins IN, Krpata DM, O'Rourke CP, et al. The clinical significance of postoperative tachycardia following ventral hernia repair. Surgery. 2016 Aug;160(2):418-25

24. Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, Cohen ME. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;217(5):833-42.e1-3.

25. Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, et al.; European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105

26. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2012; 33:2551–2567

27. Botto F, Alonso-Coello P, Chan MT, et al. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes. Anesthesiology 2014;120:564–578

28. Puelacher C, Gualandro DM, Lurati Buse G, et al. Etiology of peri-operative myocardial Infarction/Injury after noncardiac surgery and Associated Outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(16):1910–2

29. Mohyeldin M, Norman SJ, Carney A, et al. Comprehensive review of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: prevention, intervention, and long-term management strategies. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):108

30. Bello C, Rössler J, Shehata P, et al. Perioperative strategies to reduce risk of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS): a narrative review. J Clin Anesth. 2023;87:111106–111106

31. Bosco E., Hsueh L., McConeghy K.W. et al. Major adverse cardiovascular event definitions used in observational analysis of administrative databases: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):241.

32. Beattie WS, Lalu M, Bocock M, et al.; StEP COMPAC Group; Patient Comfort; Clinical Indicators; Delirium Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction Stroke; Cardiovascular; Data Extractors; Respiratory; Inflammation Sepsis; Acute Kidney Injury; Bleeding Complications Patient Blood Management; Healthcare Resource Utilisation; Patient-Centred Outcomes; Organ Failure and Survival; Cancer Surgery. Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardized Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: cardiovascular outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jan;126(1):56-66

33. Sazgary L, Puelacher C, Lurati Buse G, et al.; BASEL-PMI Investigators. Incidence of major adverse cardiac events following non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Jun 30;10(5):550–558

34. Cohn SL. The cardiac consult for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Heart 2016;102:1322–1332

35. Guo K, Xu F, Li Y, et al. Mortality and cardiac arrest rates of emergency surgery in developed and developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 May 20;24(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02559-w. PMID: 38769493; PMCID: PMC11104000. 12

36. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3227–3337

37. Halvorsen S, Mehilli J, Cassese S, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 14;43(39):3826-3924

38. Козлов И.А., Соколов Д.А., Любошевский П.А. Прогностическая и диагностическая значимость кардиального биомаркера NT-proBNP в периоперационный период хирургических вмешательств на сосудах. Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии. 2023;20(5):7-16.

39. Соколов Д.А., Любошевский П.А. Информативность периоперационного мониторинга тропонина в некардиальной хирургии. Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2024;(4):59‑65.

40. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043–1049

41. Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY, et al. Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217: 336–346.e1

42. Gupta PK, Gupta H, Sundaram A, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery. Circulation. 2011;124:381–387

43. Dakik H.A., Chehab O., Eldirani M., et al. A new index for pre-operative cardiovascular evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(24):3067-3078

44. Alrezk R., Jackson N., Al Rezk M., et al. Derivation and validation of a geriatric-sensitive perioperative cardiac risk index. J AmHeart Assoc. 2017;6(11):e006648

45. Peng X, Zhu T, Wang T, et al. Machine learning prediction of postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events in geriatric patients: a prospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Sep 10;22(1):284

46. Wu X, Hu J, Zhang J. Machine learning-based model for predicting major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients aged 65 years and older undergoing noncardiac surgery. BMC Geriatr. 2023 Dec 7;23(1):819

47. Yu J, Peng X, Zhou R, et al. Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model to predict major adverse cardiovascular events after noncardiac surgery in geriatric patients: a prospective study. Int J Surg. 2025 Feb 1;111(2):1939-1949

48. Bedford JP, Redfern OC, O'Brien B, et al. Perioperative risk scores: prediction, pitfalls, and progress. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2025 Feb 1;38(1):30-36;

49. Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, et al. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1977;297(16):845-850. doi:10.1056/NEJM197710202971601.

50. Donati A, Ruzzi M, Adrario E, et al. A new and feasible model for predicting operative risk. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93(3):393-399. doi:10.1093/bja/aeh210.

51. Sutton R, Bann S, Brooks M, Sarin S. The Surgical Risk Scale as an improved tool for risk-adjusted analysis in comparative surgical audit. Br J Surg. 2002;89(6):763-768. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02080.x.

52. Dalton JE, Kurz A, Turan A, Mascha EJ, Sessler DI, Saager L. Development and validation of a Risk Quantification Index for 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in noncardiac surgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(6):1336-1345. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e318219d5f9.

53. Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE, Lipsitz SA, Zinner MJ. An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(2):201-208.

54. Kinoshita M, Morioka N, Yabuuchi M, Ozaki M. New surgical scoring system to predict postoperative mortality. J Anesth. 2017. doi:10.1007/s00540-016-2290-2.

55. Le Manach Y., Collins G., Rodseth R. et al. Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM): Derivation and Validation. Anesthesiology. 2016; 124(3): 570–9. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000972

56. Glance LG, Lustik SJ, Hannan EL, et al. The Surgical Mortality Probability Model: derivation and validation of a simple risk prediction rule for noncardiac surgery. Ann Surg. 2012.

57. Richman JS, Hosokawa PW, Min SJ, et al. Toward prospective identification of high-risk surgical patients. Am Surg. 2012;78(7):755-760.

58. Miyazaki N, Haga Y, Matsukawa H, et al. Development and validation of the Calculation of post-Operative Risk in Emergency Surgery (CORES) model. Surg Today. 2014;44(8):1443-1456. doi:10.1007/s00595-013-0707-1.

59. Stefani LC, Gutierrez CS, Castro S, et al. Derivation and validation of a preoperative risk model for postoperative mortality: SAMPE model. PLOS One. 2017;12(10):e0187122. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187122.

60. Gutierrez CS, Passos SC, Castro SMJ, et al. Few and feasible preoperative variables can identify high-risk surgical patients: derivation and validation of the Ex-Care risk model. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126:525-532. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.036.

61. Chan D.X.H., Sim Y.E., Chan Y.H. et al. Development of the Combined Assessment of Risk Encountered in Surgery (CARES) surgical risk calculator for prediction of postsurgical mortality and need for intensive care unit admission risk: a single-center retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(3): e019427. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019427

62. Haga Y, Ikejiri K, Wada Y, et al. Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today. 1999. doi:10.1007/BF02483010.

63. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78(3):355-360. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800780327.

64. Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Br J Surg. 1998;85(9):1217-1220. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00840.x.

65. Meguid RA, Bronsert MR, Juarez-Colunga E, et al. Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS): II. Parsimonious risk models for postoperative adverse outcomes addressing need for laboratory variables and surgeon specialty-specific models. Ann Surg. 2016;264(1):10-22. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001677.

66. Protopapa K.L., Simpson J.C., Smith N.C., Moonesinghe S.R. Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT). British Journal of Surgery 2014; 101: 1774–83. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9638

67. Karamolegkou AP, Hoogeveen YL, Doeksen A, et al. Validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) and SORT v2 for predicting postoperative mortality in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing surgery. J Clin Med. 2023.

68. Mahajan A, et al. Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Identify Patients Before Surgery at High Risk for Postoperative Adverse Events. JAMA Netw Open. 2023.

69. Choi B., Oh A.R., Lee S.H. et al. Prediction Model for 30‑Day Mortality after Non-Cardiac Surgery Using Machine-Learning Techniques Based on Preoperative Evaluation of Electronic Medical Records. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(21): 6487. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216487

70. Bihorac A., Ozrazgat-Baslanti T., Ebadi A. et al. MySurgeryRisk: Development and Validation of a Machine-learning Risk Algorithm for Major Complications and Death After Surgery. Ann Surg. 2019; 269(4): 652–662. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002706

71. Corey KM, Kashyap S, Lorenzi E, et al. Development and validation of machine learning models to identify high-risk surgical patients using automatically curated electronic health record data (Pythia): a retrospective, single-site study. PLOS Med. 2018;15(11):e1002701. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002701.

72. Kowadlo G., Mittelberg Y., Ghomlaghi M. et al. Development and validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) algorithms for predicting surgical risk with machine learning. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1): 70. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02463‑w

73. Bonde A, et al. Deep learning model for postoperative risk prediction (ACS-SRC comparison). Lancet Digit Health. 2021.

74. Bertsimas D., Dunn J., Velmahos G.C., Kaafarani H.M.A. Surgical Risk Is Not Linear: Derivation and Validation of a Novel, User-friendly, and Machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator. Ann Surg. 2018 Oct; 268(4): 574–583. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002956

75. Zahid JA, Gögenur M, Ekeloef S, et al. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Colorectal Cancer Surgery, Oncological Outcomes, and Long-term Mortality: A Nationwide Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study. Ann Surg Open. 2025 Mar 6;6(1):e560

76. Park LJ, Borges FK, Ofori S, et al. Association between Complications and Death within 30 days after General Surgery: A Vascular Events in Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation (VISION) substudy. Ann Surg. 2024 Jun 11

77. Devereaux PJ, Biccard BM, Sigamani A, et al. Association of postoperative high-sensitivity troponin levels with myocardial injury and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA 2017;317: 1642–1651

78. Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):502–9

79. Hiser SL, Fatima A, Ali M, Needham DM. Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS): recent updates. J Intensive Care. 2023 May 23;11(1):23.].

80. Mikkelsen ME, Netzer G, Iwashyna T. Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). UpToDate; 2018. Updated November 18, 2022. Accessed July 26, 2023; Wang S, Allen D, Perkins A, et al. Validation of a new clinical tool for post intensive car e syndrome. Am J Crit Care. 2019;28(1):10-18].

81. Renner C, Jeitziner MM, Albert M, et al. Guideline on multimodal rehabilitation for patients with post-intensive care syndrome. Crit Care. 2023;27(301):1-14].

82. Lee M, Kang J, Jeong Y. Risk factors for post-intensive care syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Crit Care. 2020;33(3):287–94

83. Geense W, van den Boogaard M, van der Hoeven J, Vermuelen H, Hannink G, Zegers M. Nonpharmacologic interventions to prevent or mitigate adverse long-term outcomes among ICU survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(11):1607–18

84. Wunsch H, Gershengorn HB, Cooke CR, et al. Use of intensive care services for medicare beneficiaries undergoing major surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2016;124(4):899-907 158

85. Guo R, Cui N. Intensive care unit readmission and unexpected death after emergency general surgery. Heliyon. 2023 Mar 9;9(3):e14278

86. Corey K.M., Kashyap S., Lorenzi E. et al. Development and validation of machine learning models to identify high-risk surgical patients using automatically curated electronic health record data (Pythia): A retrospective, single-site study. PLoS Med. 2018; 15(11): e1002701. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002701]

87. Thompson A, Fleischmann KE, Smilowitz NR, et al.; Peer Review Committee Members. 2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Nov 5;150(19):e351-e442

88. Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3415-3537

89. Сумин А.Н., Дупляков Д.В., Белялов Ф.И. и др. Рекомендации по оценке и коррекции сердечно-сосудистых рисков при несердечных операциях 2023. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2023;28(8):5555.

90. Заболотских И.Б., Трембач Н.В., Магомедов М.А., Краснов В.Г., и соавт. Сравнительная оценка шкал прогнозирования неблагоприятного послеоперационного исхода: предварительные результаты МЦИ «Роль сопутствующих заболеваний в стратификации риска послеоперационных осложнений в абдоминальной хирургии STOPRISK». Вестник интенсивной терапии имени А.И. Салтанова. 2022;(3):27–44. doi:10.21320/1818-474X-2022-3-27-44.