ВЕРИФИКАЦИЯ БЛОКА МИТРАЛЬНОГО ИСТМУСА С ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ ЕДИНСТВЕННОГО КАТЕТЕРА

Представлен клинический случай электрофизиологического исследования и катетерной аблации правопредсердного трепетания у пациентки, ранее перенесшей радиочастотную аблацию левостороннего бокового дополнительного пути проведения. Описана техника верификации блока проведения через митральный истмус с использованием единственного электрода, позволяющая отказаться от ненужной транссептальной пункции, катетеризации дополнительной центральной вены и использования лишнего катетера.

1. Adenosine can improve the intra-atrial conduction block along the mitral an-nulus during accessory pathway ablation T. Yamada [et al.] Europace 2008. Vol. 10(3). P. 303-305.

2. Atrial tachycardia after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fi-brillation: mechanistic insights, results of catheter ablation, and risk factors for recurrence S. Chae [et al.] J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007. Vol. 50. P. 1781–1787.

3. Block of the mitral-pulmonary isthmus during ablation of a single left-sided accessory pathway causing different patterns of retrograde atrial activation J.T. de Vasconcelos [et al.] Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2002. Vol. 78(5). P. 497-509.

4. Bulava A., Hanis J., Sitek D. Mitral isthmus conduction block: intriguing result of radiofrequency catheter ablation for a left concealed accessory pathway Eu-ropace 2010. Vol. 12(4). P. 579-581.

5. Differential pacing for distinguishing block from persistent conduction through an ablation line D. Shah [et al.] Circulation 2000. Vol. 102. P. 1517– 1522.

6. Electrical conduction between the right atrium and the left atrium via the mus-culature of the coronary sinus M. Antz [et al.] Circulation 1998. Vol. 98. P. 1790–1795.

7. Evidence for an incomplete mitral isthmus block after failed ablation of a left postero- inferior concealed accessory pathway A. Bortone [et al.] Europace 2006. Vol. 8(6). P. 434-437.

8. HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical abla-tion of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European CardiacArrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American Col-lege of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Socie-ty of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and approved by the governing bod-ies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm As-sociation, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society H. Calkins [et al.] Europace 2007. Vol. 9. P. 335–379.

9. Intra-atrial conduction block along the mitral valve annulus during accessory pathway ablation: evidence for a left atrial «isthmus» D.M. Luria [et al.] J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2001. Vol. 12(7). P. 744-749.

10. Left atrial linear lesions are required for successful treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation S. Knecht [et al.] Eur. Heart J. 2008. Vol. 29(19). P. 2359-2366.

11. Left mitral isthmus ablation associated with PV Isolation: long-term results of a prospective randomized study G. Fassini [et al.] J. Cardiovasc. Electro-physiol. 2005. Vol. 16(11). P. 1150-1156.

12. Linear cryoablation of the left atrium versus pulmonary vein cryoisolation in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease: corre-lation of electroanatomic mapping and long-term clinical results F. Gaita [et al.] Circulation 2005. Vol. 111(2). P. 136-142.

13. Prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical significance of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia during and following left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation A. Chugh [et al.] Heart Rhythm 2005. Vol. 2. P. 464–471.

14. Substrate modification combined with pulmonary vein isolation improves outcome of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized comparison S. Willems [et al.] Eur. Heart J. 2006. Vol. 27(23). P. 2871-2878.