CARDIAC EVENTS AND THEIR PREVENTION IN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM SURGERY
https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2013-0-4-3-10
Abstract
Purpose. To compare and evaluate the nature of events after different revascularization strategies in patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysm and concomitant ischemic heart disease and, based on the analysis of the obtained data, to choose the safest revascularization strategy in this category of patients.
Material and methods. The treatment results were assessed in the two groups of patients. Group 1 included 79 (40,1 %) patients, who underwent an open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm with pharmacological treatment of the concomitant coronary disease, and Group 2 consisted of 118 (59,9 %) patients, who first underwent surgical and/or endovascular coronary revascularization and then an open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Results. Group 2 was found to have significantly less cardiovascular events and less cardiovascular mortality, which was due to the approach consisting in all the abdominal aortic aneurysm patients undergoing coronary angiography and, in case there was a stenotic coronary lesion, coronary revascularization was performed first with a surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm being done afterwards.
Conclusion. Coronary angiography in patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysm can help identify the group of patients who would benefit from first-stage coronary revascularization, which could lead to less cardiac events and less surgical mortality when abdominal aortic aneurysm is treated.
About the Authors
A. M. Chernyavskiy
Federal State Budgetary Institution Academician E. N. Meshalkin Research Institute for Circulatory Pathology, Russian Ministry of Health, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
head of aorta, coronary and peripheral arteries surgery center of E. N. Meshalkin FSBI RI for Blood Circulation Pathologies of the Ministry of Health of RF (Novosibirsk), Dr. Med. Sci., Professor; 15, Rechkunovskaya St., Novosibirsk. 630055 Tel.: +7 (383) 347 60 58
Russian Federation
head of aorta, coronary and peripheral arteries surgery center of E. N. Meshalkin FSBI RI for Blood Circulation Pathologies of the Ministry of Health of RF (Novosibirsk), Dr. Med. Sci., Professor; 15, Rechkunovskaya St., Novosibirsk. 630055 Tel.: +7 (383) 347 60 58
A. A. Karpenko
Federal State Budgetary Institution Academician E. N. Meshalkin Research Institute for Circulatory Pathology, Russian Ministry of Health, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. A. Chernyavsky
Federal State Budgetary Institution Academician E. N. Meshalkin Research Institute for Circulatory Pathology, Russian Ministry of Health, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Djusupov
Semey State Medical University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Н. Рахметов
Semey State Medical University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
References
1. Белов Ю. В ., Комаров Р. Н. Тактика хирургического лечения мультифокальных стенотических поражений артериальных бассейнов // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н. И. Пирогова. 2007. № 3. С. 60–64.
2. Кардиальные осложнения у больных с атеросклеротическим сочетанным поражением брахиоцефальных артерий и брюшной аорты / Л. А. Бокерия [и др.] // Анналы хирургии. 2004. № 4. С. 8–14.
3. Результаты операций при этапном и одномоментном хирургическом лечении пациентов с ишемической болезнью сердца, аневризмами брюшной аорты и поражениями магистральных артерий нижних конечностей / Б. А. Константинов [и др.] // Креативная кардиология. 2008. № 1. С. 47–55.
4. Хирургическая тактика у больных с аневризмой брюшной аорты и ишемической болезнью сердца / П. О. Казанчян [и др.] // Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2008. № 2. С. 30–35.
5. Aorto-caval fistulas: a review of eighteen years experience / I. S. Cinara [et al.] // Acta Chir. Belg. 2005. Vol. 105. P. 616–620.
6. Bengtsson H., Bergqvist D. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: A population-based study // J. Vase. Surg. 2005. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 74–80.
7. Bremner D. N., Shand J. E., Kenyon G. S. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm // J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. 1977. Vol. 22 (6). P. 400–407.
8. Choksy S. A., Wilmink A. B., Quick C. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Huntingdon district: a 10-year experience // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1999. Vol. 81 (1). P. 27–31.
9. Does immediate operation for symptomatic nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm compromise outcome? / A. L. Tambyraja [et al.] // Eur. J. Vase. Endovasc. Surg. 2004. Vol. 28 (5). P. 543–546.
10. Infected aortic aneurysms: Aggressive presentation, complicated early outcome, but durable results / G. S. Oderich [et al.] // J. Vase. Surg. 2001. Vol. 34, № 5. P. 900–908.
11. Hypotensive resuscitation in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm / K. Roberts [et al.] // Eur. J. Vase. Endovasc. Surg. 2006. Vol. 31 (4). P. 339–344.
12. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery / F. L. Moll [et al.] // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2011 Vol. 41. Suppl. S1:S1–S58.
13. Oxford screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 65 to 74 years / J. Collin [et al.] // Lancet. 2009. Vol. 10. P. 613–615.
14. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Is it possible to predict outcome? / R. Calderwood [et al.] // Int. Angioi. 2004. Vol. 23. P. 47–53.
15. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: the harborview experience / K. Johansen [et al.] // J. Vasс. Surg. 1991, Vol. 13. P. 240–245.
16. Rupture of the left kidney following renosplenic shunt / R. J. Swanson [et al.] // Surgery. 1976. Vol. 79 (6). P. 710–712.
17. The epidemiology of surgically repaired aneurysms in the United States / P. F. Lawrence [et al.] // J. Vase. Surg. 1999 Vol. 30, № 4. P. 632–640.
Review
For citations:
Chernyavskiy A.M., Karpenko A.A., Chernyavsky M.A., Djusupov A.A., CARDIAC EVENTS AND THEIR PREVENTION IN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM SURGERY. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2013;(4):88-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2013-0-4-3-10
Views:
689
